|
|
#11
03-26-2004, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Intercasino Will Hill down yesterday evening?
Me too.
It's the same cut % - you're playing at higher stakes (dollar for dollar) so it makes sense that the rake would be higher as well. I think we've been down this road before - it's really not that hard. 
|
|
#12
03-26-2004, 01:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intercasino Will Hill down yesterday evening?
I think we've been down this road before - it's really not that hard.
I'm a big fan of the condescending "it's really not that hard" replies. My point was that you can play in a 5/10 dollar game with a cap of $3 or you can play in a 3/6 pound game with a cap of 3 pounds. Which game would you play?
|
|
#13
03-26-2004, 01:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intercasino Will Hill down yesterday evening?
Well, that example is different than the one I was arguing. Your example shows a clear rake discount for the 5/10 game. That wasn't my point.
A $3 rake in a $1/2 game, is the same ratio as a 3 pound rake in a 1/2 pound game. That is my point as clearly as I can say it. I'm done talking now.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
