How not to get to the bottom of something !

[ThaSaltCracka]

funny...... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[Taxman]

And what you should have found if you ever read my posts fully was that I was making conjectures and challenging you to back up your own opinion, which you never did to my satisfaction. I fully admited lacking a complete understanding of the economic subtleties, but you did not present anything better. You of course never admitted gaps of knowledge, so I must assume that you are unaware that you possess them (or perhaps you simply are on a different level than me?). Trust me, nobody's opinion is more important than mine (execpt my girlfriend's [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]).

[ThaSaltCracka]

aha now we know who wears the pants in the relationship [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img], who wears the panties? [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[MattHatter]

"I do agree a complete investigation is proper, the problem is that the Criminaliberals only want an aura of impropriety to continue far enough into the election cycle to help retake power with little or no concern for the actual truth." -Wake up CALL


I think it's important to note that the only reason mr hastert provides for why he would want to stand in the way of an extension is that they "probably" had enough time to do thier job. You can judge for yourself, but there doesn't seem to be too much "concern for the actual truth" there.

Again politics or no, the extension seems like a no brainer.

Perhaps both the parties are interested in spinning for political leverage? I think we can assume thats true.

But the question remains why stand in the way of the extension in the first place?


Matt

PS: Calling liberals names won't get to the bottom of it.

[Wake up CALL]

[ QUOTE ]
PS: Calling liberals names won't get to the bottom of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Matt you have joined the forum since I was asked to coin a term for a specific group of liberals so as not to refer to respectable liberals such as AndyFox, John Cole and others whom I respect. So you see it is for a matter of differentiation not just to be calling names. I find it very specific, useful and accurate. I am sure all the non-criminaliberals appreciate your concern.

Wake

[MattHatter]

Oh. Ok.

lol. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]


Matt