Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-15-2005, 07:05 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ, strange action

[ QUOTE ]
Since I'm pretty much positive that raising the turn would have, in retrospect, been the correct play, I'll go ahead and post results in white.

UTG+1 had AK, no diamond. WTF indeed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Come to think of it. I saw two players tonight that relentlesly donked raisers w/AK UI post-flop. Is this something Hellmuth advocates in one of his terrible books or something? Looks like a new trend. lol
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:12 AM
testaaja testaaja is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Finland!
Posts: 71
Default Re: QQ, strange action

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Since I'm pretty much positive that raising the turn would have, in retrospect, been the correct play, I'll go ahead and post results in white.

UTG+1 had AK, no diamond. WTF indeed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Come to think of it. I saw two players tonight that relentlesly donked raisers w/AK UI post-flop. Is this something Hellmuth advocates in one of his terrible books or something? Looks like a new trend. lol

[/ QUOTE ]
I've seen this too! It must be a new trend [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:56 AM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: QQ, strange action

people who play AK like this retard watch too much WSOP. enjoy having them at your table. they overvalue everything.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-15-2005, 09:06 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ, strange action

Grunch:

I'm raising the turn here. WNR* (with no reads - which I think we need to make a new acronym), its hard to define a range of holdings here, but you are ahead of anything except a set or AA-KK. However, there is a flush & str8 draw which could be in either of their potential holdings range.

With the 4 on the riv, I probably call the maniac's bet, but if I felt confident that I wasn't going to see A5 or 65?, then I raise here and call a 3 bet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-15-2005, 12:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ, strange action

:grunch:

Really wierd hand. I think I would have raised on the turn, just to see what's up. I feel like SB has TPHK or turned an OESD.

I would call UTG+1's river donk just b/c I don't believe he hit his wheel. He might have spiked two pair, but I'm not folding with this large of a pot.

EDIT: I would write on note on the player and then isolate and punish relentlessly to the point of being a maniac.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-15-2005, 01:10 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QQ, strange action

grunch

why aren't you popping this turn with your reads? I think the donk bet by SB could be to prevent a free card to UI overs or a fd. The only reasonable hand that is beating you is 99 (other than KK and AA) and I am not giving SB credit for that just yet. Though some sort of a real read would help.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.