|
|
#13
11-29-2005, 01:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
[ QUOTE ]
i play it differently, but this looks ok [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious as well. Are you 3 betting this flop OOP or check raising OOP? Do you really think either of these lines is better? 
|
|
#14
11-29-2005, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i play it differently, but this looks ok [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious as well. Are you 3 betting this flop OOP or check raising OOP? Do you really think either of these lines is better? [/ QUOTE ] i think both of those lines are worse, it does help to know something about villain though. I really dont think op played it badly at all, sometimes I'd make it 3.25$ pf, although now I think about it, calling here is better. scdavis's line is the other I'd consider, although most of the time I'd just bet less on the flop.
|
|
#15
11-29-2005, 01:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
thats a perfect semi bluff, shows pot commiting, and ak isnt in bad shape here 44% post flop and if he has a read on hero then its def a great play. build the pot early in a close situation so when you hit there may be enough money in the pot to get paid off
|
|
#16
11-29-2005, 02:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
[ QUOTE ]
thats a perfect semi bluff, shows pot commiting, and ak isnt in bad shape here 44% post flop and if he has a read on hero then its def a great play. build the pot early in a close situation so when you hit there may be enough money in the pot to get paid off [/ QUOTE ] AK is 37% post flop. And the semibluff double the pot checkraise is a bit of a rarity at $25NL. Don't overthink this one.
|
|
#17
11-29-2005, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
i can attest to this being a good fold as i had the same hand come up today. picked up 99 UTG, call one caller behind. everything the same except i three bet and get blown up by KK. dog damnit i suck.
|
|
#18
11-29-2005, 02:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
AKs where suit is 1 card on board and 99 doesnt share suit ak is 41% (sorry) post flop so IMO a big semi bluff but not bad if he puts him on a mid pp
|
|
#19
11-29-2005, 02:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
[ QUOTE ]
AKs where suit is 1 card on board and 99 doesnt share suit ak is 41% (sorry) post flop so IMO a big semi bluff but not bad if he puts him on a mid pp [/ QUOTE ] Okay, I ran it as AKo but I guess we should compromise since of the 16 AK possible, 25% are suited and 75% are offsuit. (If one of hero's 9s is of the same suit as the AKs, it loses very slightly as well.) Synthesis: Villain is 38% post flop on average with any of the possible AK combos.
|
|
#20
11-29-2005, 02:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The infamous low overpair. Stadard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i play it differently, but this looks ok [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious as well. Are you 3 betting this flop OOP or check raising OOP? Do you really think either of these lines is better? [/ QUOTE ] i think both of those lines are worse, it does help to know something about villain though. I really dont think op played it badly at all, sometimes I'd make it 3.25$ pf, although now I think about it, calling here is better. scdavis's line is the other I'd consider, although most of the time I'd just bet less on the flop. [/ QUOTE ] I had thought about repopping it pre-flop, but 99 isn't a hand I want to get all-in pre-flop and it's difficult to play OOP against a PFR, so I figured that a stop and go would be my best bet.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
