Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:42 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Bad bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
The turn was not a complete brick

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant it was a brick from the opponent's persepctive. Sure, he might also have just made a flush draw, but the odds are really against it. Almost every time Hero checks this turn, the opponent will check behind.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:44 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: Bad bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The turn was not a complete brick

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant it was a brick from the opponent's persepctive. Sure, he might also have just made a flush draw, but the odds are really against it. Almost every time Hero checks this turn, the opponent will check behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hero did check the turn and villain bet [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] That's why I like the check/raise better than the call here.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:51 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Bad bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The turn was not a complete brick

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant it was a brick from the opponent's persepctive. Sure, he might also have just made a flush draw, but the odds are really against it. Almost every time Hero checks this turn, the opponent will check behind.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hero did check the turn and villain bet [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] That's why I like the check/raise better than the call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm saying that Hero going for a check-raise here will usually fail. It wouldn't have in this specific case, but to say that the best play here is to go for a checkk-raise is to be results-oriented.

Suppose hero posted this instead:

Preflop: Hero is SB with A, J.
1 fold, MP raises to $3, Button calls $3, Hero calls $2.50, BB calls $2.

Flop: ($12) 5, K, 5 (4 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, MP checks, Button checks.

Turn: ($12) 2 (4 players)
Hero ... ?

Would you still recommend check-raise? We have no reason to believe that the opponent will bet here if we check. If we are going to run a bluff, we should bet ourselves instead. If we check here, the opponent will usually check behind.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:59 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: Bad bluff?

I see your point. I agree that in general, the c/r is destined to fail, but in this case I felt it was the best (even if it is likely to be unsucessful) chance for hero to take down the pot.

Don't you have to be results-oriented to a certain degree to evaluate each situation since there are no one-size-fits-all rules. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-25-2005, 01:29 PM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: Bad bluff?

hm, that's an interesting question...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-25-2005, 01:38 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 69
Default Re: Bad bluff?

MP's stack size makes this a really bad preflop call.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-25-2005, 11:49 PM
Rooger Rooger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 75
Default Re: Bad bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
MP's stack size makes this a really bad preflop call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not that interested in MP - only in villain.
I get 3:1 on my call - is it that bad? I know I'm OOP, but villains range is quite broad. Villains HR is also quite big IMO.
I usually C/F the flop if I don't hit hard, but I felt like making a move, because I felt that villain was a thinking opponent who would fold a small PP.

Villain insta-folded my river bet, and I took down the pot. But it seems like the general consensus is it's -EV.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-25-2005, 11:55 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Bad bluff?

Trying to bluff into 3 people multiway on a dry river card... one of which is short stacked isn't a great idea. HU I'll pop it here if I think the opponent will lay down.

Otherwise you got lucky they all folded.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-26-2005, 12:09 AM
Rooger Rooger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 75
Default Re: Bad bluff?

[ QUOTE ]
Trying to bluff into 3 people multiway on a dry river card... one of which is short stacked isn't a great idea. HU I'll pop it here if I think the opponent will lay down.

[/ QUOTE ]

We were HU at the river - I called the turn thinking I had immlied odds to chase my flush/maybe overcard/pure bluff if I got (a) call(s), and could take the pot if I was HU against villain.
I might've been lucky - it seems like people don't like the move, so I guess it's not one to incorporate ATM [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.