|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which state? | |||
| Idaho |
   
|
28 | 8.21% |
| West Virginia |
  
|
42 | 12.32% |
| Wisconsin |
  
|
6 | 1.76% |
| Utah |
  
|
23 | 6.74% |
| Arkansas |
  
|
27 | 7.92% |
| Ohio |
  
|
7 | 2.05% |
| Wyoming |
|
39 | 11.44% |
| Iowa |
|
15 | 4.40% |
| Alaska |
|
7 | 2.05% |
| Nebraska |
|
13 | 3.81% |
| North Dakota |
|
74 | 21.70% |
| South Dakota |
|
21 | 6.16% |
| Montana |
|
18 | 5.28% |
| Oregon |
|
8 | 2.35% |
| Washington |
|
13 | 3.81% |
| Voters: 341. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
11-23-2005, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
Voted for Mike, but I wish I had voted for Kanter.
|
|
#14
11-23-2005, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
[ QUOTE ]
btw who voted for lazar [/ QUOTE ] He probably logged on and voted for himself.
|
|
#15
11-23-2005, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] black is close. Don't forget, he was at the final table when Stu Ungar won. But then again, i've never seen any of these guys play more than a handful of...hands. [/ QUOTE ] Black seemed like he was playing good but I can't give him too much credit after his atrocious table talk in the hand where he had a set against Kanter. [/ QUOTE ] from the cardplayer broadcast, black played a really excellent the whole way. however, i agree that his table talk in that hand was awful. just stfu and let kanter pay you off. [/ QUOTE ] From the information on the hands that you gleaned listening to the broadcast, or from Helmuth constantly saying he was the best player? The K-J all-in play over Barch's raise (the day before the FT) was pretty questionable too, IMO.
|
|
#16
11-23-2005, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
Matusow is clearly the best, and he might have won it if he hadn't lost the KK vs. AA hand. It's fortunate he didn't, since everyone at the 2/4 tables would try to act like him.
Hachem is the most underrated. I don't know why 3 people have voted for Dannenman.
|
|
#17
11-23-2005, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
[ QUOTE ]
Matusow is clearly the best, and he might have won it if he hadn't lost the KK vs. AA hand. It's fortunate he didn't, since everyone at the 2/4 tables would try to act like him. Hachem is the most underrated. I don't know why 3 people have voted for Dannenman. [/ QUOTE ] That board should show 100% Matusow, no doubt about that he was the most talented player on that table. Imo after that is goes like this: 1. Matusow 2-3. Hachem and Black 4. Barch
|
|
#18
11-23-2005, 07:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Most talented player at WSOP final table
Matusow (easily)
Black Barch Hachem Bergdorf (The guy no one noticed who was there) Dannemon Kondracki Lazar Kanter I think this is pretter accurate. I really didn't see enough of Kondracki to judge his play, He didn't look bad, playing as the short-stack at the final table though.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
