|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do viewers still need to be educated? | |||
| No--viewers are already informed |
   
|
63 | 80.77% |
| Yes--Show us hand ranks and explain how the game is played. |
  
|
15 | 19.23% |
| Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#15
11-21-2005, 11:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Best 3-Man Band Ever
Out of the bands on this list it's RUSH hands down.
If The Police were on here it would be a tough call but I would still lean towards RUSH simply because they have stayed together as a band and they just plain and simple kick ass. I saw RUSH live, back in the day, and they were simply off the planet good. Never had the pleasure of seeing The Police live but I would bet they were knock down drag out good as well. 
|
|
#17
11-21-2005, 11:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 3-Man Band Ever
The fact that nirvana is coming in 1st really shows the avg age of posters here.
|
|
#18
11-21-2005, 11:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 3-Man Band Ever
'80s Floyd man!!
<font color="white">Totally kidding. Obviously it's Rush.</font>
|
|
#19
11-21-2005, 11:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 3-Man Band Ever
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The Beatles minus a drummer. [/ QUOTE ] The Smiths minus a singer? [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
|
|
#20
11-21-2005, 11:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Best 3-Man Band Ever
[ QUOTE ]
The fact that nirvana is coming in 1st really shows the avg age of posters here. [/ QUOTE ] Nirvana was really not very good [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
