Best Pros for Various Categories

[moa]

[ QUOTE ]
Who would you consider... (all questions relate to NL texas holdem tournaments)

Best player? Phil Ivey

Most aggressive player? Layne Flack

Best at making correct reads? Marcel Luske

Best at post-flop decision making? Phil Hellmuth

Most feared? Phil Ivey

Unreadable? Chris Fergusson

Best heads up? Doyle Brunson

Best at large fields? Dan Harrington

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I love posters like you. You can't contribute anything to the discussion, which will obviously be subjective, and so you pretend to be smart and tell everyone that they do not have the credentials to post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I'm sure that posting about the most UNREADABLE professional isn't subjective at all on your part. You've played countless hours with these professionals, so I'm sure you know exactly how READABLE or FEARED someone is. Good work.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love posters like you. You can't contribute anything to the discussion, which will obviously be subjective, and so you pretend to be smart and tell everyone that they do not have the credentials to post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I'm sure that posting about the most UNREADABLE professional isn't subjective at all on your part. You've played countless hours with these professionals, so I'm sure you know exactly how READABLE or FEARED someone is. Good work.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess you don't know what the word subjective means.

Objectivity is a matter of fact, subjectivity is more opinion based; a point of view.

[ QUOTE ]
Who would you consider... (all questions relate to NL texas holdem tournaments)

Best player?

Most aggressive player?

Best at making correct reads?

Best at post-flop decision making?

Most feared?

Unreadable?

Best heads up?

Best at large fields?

[/ QUOTE ]

These questions cannot be answered without having played extensively with whatever pool of players you are drawing from.

For example, the first response said Layne Flack is more aggresive than Phil I-- nope not even close.

[ QUOTE ]
Objectivity is a matter of fact, subjectivity is more opinion based; a point of view.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and there's no "fact" of who is the best at this and that. It's all subjective.

[jusander]

Best player? Phil Ivey

Most aggressive player? John Phan

Best at making correct reads? Daniel Negreanu

Best at post-flop decision making? Phil Ivey

Most feared? Phil Ivey

Unreadable? Phil Ivey

Best heads up? Phil Ivey

Best at large fields? Phil Ivey

[BigBiceps]

I vote Chris Ferguson for unreadable.

Best Player- Ivey
Most Agressive- Tie between Tuan Le and David Pham
Best at Making Correct reads- Negreanu... Its just sick sometimes.
Best at post-flop decision making- Ivey
Most Feared- Ivey
Unreadable- Ivey/Ferguson/Laak
Heads up- God I hate to say this... Hellmuth.
Large Fields- Raymer

[TheMainEvent]

A lot of people are saying Negreanu for 'best reads' but keep in mind that a lot of the other pros are making the same reads they just don't say them out loud every time [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]