Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-17-2005, 12:45 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A good river fold I think

argh... just fold it preflop already

why are you limping that hand on the button in 6m??
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-17-2005, 12:54 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
Button is unknown so I'm assuming semi-loose passive 23/10-ish.

[/ QUOTE ]

23 VPIP is semi-loose?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-17-2005, 01:55 PM
BatsShadow BatsShadow is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 84
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
argh... just fold it preflop already

why are you limping that hand on the button in 6m??

[/ QUOTE ]

My Maniac tendencies:

How much are we losing by playing this hand? Don't we win more when we are ahead and lose less when behind because we are good players? At 6max I want my opponents to call my bets a lot, so I never want them to know what I have.

I play this hand every time with 2 limpers in front of me. Show me why I should stop.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-17-2005, 04:35 PM
J. Stew J. Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Button is unknown so I'm assuming semi-loose passive 23/10-ish.

[/ QUOTE ]

23 VPIP is semi-loose?

[/ QUOTE ]

Whoops, thinking I was full ring.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-17-2005, 04:47 PM
J. Stew J. Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
I'd pay off with trips. I'd pay off with a pair of aces. I wouldn't pay off with anything weaker. He may be "bluffing" a medium-strength hand here like ace-no-kicker.

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem that I have in paying off is that the board looks just as scary to him if he has no heart. Sure he could be bluffing, but he doesn't know I could possibly lay down a hand I've been betting the whole way. Most .5/1 players would call a donk with just a pair no heart. I'm assuming he knows he's getting a river call rather than thinking he can get me to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-17-2005, 04:51 PM
J. Stew J. Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
Even passive players are capable of finding a river bluff when a) the board pairs or b) a fourth flush-card hits. I would call this unless villain is just a complete uber-fish.

[/ QUOTE ]

You think at .5/1 though?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-17-2005, 05:00 PM
J. Stew J. Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm the villian I bet this river every single time regardless of what I have.

[/ QUOTE ]

Spewage minus a read I think.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-17-2005, 05:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A good river fold I think

grunch

good fold
on the river he probably has the flush or hit the full house

the pot is too small to call since you are behind to so many holdings
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-17-2005, 05:35 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 87
Default Re: A good river fold I think

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd pay off with trips. I'd pay off with a pair of aces. I wouldn't pay off with anything weaker. He may be "bluffing" a medium-strength hand here like ace-no-kicker.

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem that I have in paying off is that the board looks just as scary to him if he has no heart. Sure he could be bluffing, but he doesn't know I could possibly lay down a hand I've been betting the whole way. Most .5/1 players would call a donk with just a pair no heart. I'm assuming he knows he's getting a river call rather than thinking he can get me to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

The scariness of the board makes it *MORE* likely that he's bluffing, not less. If it were a brick, it's more likely that you're going to call, so it's not worth even trying to bluff. Even the very poor players recognize this. They're not weighing the chance of you folding against the size of the pot, and they're almost certainly not considering the previous action. A bluffing card fell, and now they think they can bluff you out of the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-17-2005, 06:01 PM
ZenMusician ZenMusician is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Are the Queens called Quoons?
Posts: 77
Default Re: A good river fold I think

You are not allowed to post 4 times in a row with that avatar!

I wish I had a cookie...

-ZEN
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.