|
|
#11
11-15-2005, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Oh you tiny little flush (or Why do I play at this table anyway?).
No, i think I three-bet the turn. Tightwad, who I was sure had AA, then capped. I figured, eh, he's got ten outs. Then when the river failed to pair the board and he bet, I said, [censored]. There's nothing like drawing dead and putting in an inane number of hands while doing so.
[ QUOTE ] EDIT: You were certainly tending towards the LAGish side as the night went on... and although my memory sucks, I am confident in that. EDIT #2: TT's pants sucked more than my memory but I left too early to see the girlfriend. [/ QUOTE ] Edit 1: Yeah, as the table got shorter, or as I got more bored, or, yeah. But not laggy during this hand, I don't think. I mean, it wasn't like there were 4 spades on the board. Edit 2: She's cute. 
|
|
#12
11-15-2005, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Oh you tiny little flush (or Why do I play at this table anyway?).
[ QUOTE ]
EDIT #2: TT's pants sucked more than my memory but I left too early to see the girlfriend. [/ QUOTE ] My pants cost more than Brett's rent, and Mrs TT is hot hot hot, but that goes without saying [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] ok, silliness aside.... this hand was totally [censored] and the thread is essentially useless. There really were no significant decisions of note except for the way I played my hand. So to keep things simple, why don't I repost the hand from my perspective in a few days after the thread dies. The turn & river decisions are rather interesting.. PS: I did not feel Bret played like a lag, not sure why TMTTR felt he did. The table was 5-7 handed hence his perception may have been wrong. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
11-15-2005, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Oh you tiny little flush (or Why do I play at this table anyway?).
[ QUOTE ]
PS: I did not feel Bret played like a lag, not sure why TMTTR felt he did. [/ QUOTE ] To keep this thread going (unnecessarily): I guess you missed some of the hands he was showing down while you were conducting other business... I think he would agree that his pre-flop opening and raising standards changed quite a bit during the two hours plus that I was there. Also, he was LAGish compared to you so it was a way of differentiating the two of you without identifying you -- which I should have done at the start.
|
|
#14
11-15-2005, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Oh you tiny little flush (or Why do I play at this table anyway?).
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] PS: I did not feel Bret played like a lag, not sure why TMTTR felt he did. [/ QUOTE ] To keep this thread going (unnecessarily): I guess you missed some of the hands he was showing down while you were conducting other business... I think he would agree that his pre-flop opening and raising standards changed quite a bit during the two hours plus that I was there. Also, he was LAGish compared to you so it was a way of differentiating the two of you without identifying you -- which I should have done at the start. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] unnecessarily [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
11-15-2005, 02:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Oh you tiny little flush (or Why do I play at this table anyway?).
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] PS: I did not feel Bret played like a lag, not sure why TMTTR felt he did. [/ QUOTE ] To keep this thread going (unnecessarily): I guess you missed some of the hands he was showing down while you were conducting other business... I think he would agree that his pre-flop opening and raising standards changed quite a bit during the two hours plus that I was there. Also, he was LAGish compared to you so it was a way of differentiating the two of you without identifying you -- which I should have done at the start. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] unnecessarily [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Nicely done.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
