|
|
#12
11-08-2005, 01:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
The difference between me and you is that while I respect those players I do not revere them. In fact after reading KKF thread on his database my bb/100 hands is significantly higher. While these players are quality there are alot more players who simply choose not to post and create a reputation. This is not a thread about me gaining respect, nor is it a challenge. I dont really mind the responses. The only thing I care about it is money.
No that is not my SN and I would prefer not to say what it is. 
|
|
#13
11-08-2005, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
Perhaps I am just questioning myself after the Five 3 outers taht I lost my stack to in the past 3 days. [/ QUOTE ] Are you new to poker or sth ? Five 3outers in 3days ? LOL. Is it your worst streak ever ? If so you are the on the hottest run in the history of poker...
|
|
#14
11-08-2005, 01:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
look, the reason why people are laughing at your post and not giving serious replies is bc its pretty clear that you either dont understand poker and varience, or more likely, that you are lying/exaggerating.
a player good enough to win at a 10-20 level, let alone winning while playing 10 tables should know that 4-5 buyins dropped bc of bad beats is a normal weekly thing. i asked your SN bc i have never seen anyone play that many tables in the last 3 weeks that party has changed. maybe we just play at seperate times though.
|
|
#15
11-08-2005, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
To me, optimum strategy for four-tabling is adjusting to opponents and playing a slightly loose style. For 13 tables, it has to be supertight-aggressive. The solution to people taking stabs at you is to occasionally stab back with nothing. It does not have to be often.
I am curious how you can play that many hands. How do you fold that fast? Does your index finger hurt? Matt
|
|
#16
11-08-2005, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
To me, optimum strategy for four-tabling is adjusting to opponents and playing a slightly loose style. For 13 tables, it has to be supertight-aggressive. The solution to people taking stabs at you is to occasionally stab back with nothing. It does not have to be often. I am curious how you can play that many hands. How do you fold that fast? Does your index finger hurt? Matt [/ QUOTE ] His father was an alien and thus he has the power to stop time by touching his index fingers together.
|
|
#19
11-08-2005, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
a player good enough to win at a 10-20 level, let alone winning while playing 10 tables should know that 4-5 buyins dropped bc of bad beats is a normal daily thing. [/ QUOTE ] FYP
|
|
#20
11-08-2005, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
DON'T LISTEN TO THE HATERS. I'm just like you, the only time I ever really have losing days is when I 1-table high stakes poker (25/50+) and variance (re: bad play) rapes me. I rarely post a losing day, let alone losing week if I'm sticking to 8-9 tabling 5/10 or 10/20 nl. Just remember it doesn't really "reduce varaince" by playing 10 tables, it just reduces the chance you post losing days b/c you play that many more hands than most and play a more TAG style than most. Yeah whenever I post a losing day after I 8-9 tabled 1000 nl or 2000 nl I know I must've been on extreme donk tilt and it wasn't poker gods.
edit: pm me if you wanna chat on aim or something
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
