Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-07-2005, 04:35 AM
gildwulf gildwulf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 3/6 six-max and $20-50 SNGs
Posts: 846
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

Is OP serious?

You check to a pre-flop raiser on a draw heavy board, he bets in position and anyone thinks about folding this? You should have donked this flop and pushed a non-scary turn. As it is, you need to check-raise here. This is a raise and it's not close.

Also, I don't really support calling with Jacks with 3 folds in front pre-flop. Because you called preflop, you know little to nothing about his hand. If you raised 3X and he reraised you pre-flop then we can consider folding to a push.

Peace,
Zach
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-07-2005, 04:42 AM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 786
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

[ QUOTE ]
There is some seriously questionable advice in this thread;

- If you're scared of overpairs don't play poker?
- Check fold flop?
- Check raise all-in (this lets villain play very well, although we're getting better)?

What about addressing the pf limp and the flop check?

[/ QUOTE ]

Overpair vs. overpair in a SNG is an occupational hazard. It's a very bad idea to play scared of them. Make up your mind, and if you're wrong, just start another.

You're better off folding preflop than check-folding the flop... well... that flop anyway. Really, why would you ever think of see this flop and then check-folding?

Check-raising is the ideal play since I'm putting him on probably AK or AQ. Why? You let him (over)bet for you, and now you have a chance to win a fair number of chips for nothing, or let him draw to his 4-outer for all his chips. A minraise is giving him close-to-correct implied odds to call, so don't make it close.

The preflop limp is barely OK I guess, although I think raising is way better.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2005, 05:03 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There is some seriously questionable advice in this thread;

- If you're scared of overpairs don't play poker?
- Check fold flop?
- Check raise all-in (this lets villain play very well, although we're getting better)?

What about addressing the pf limp and the flop check?

[/ QUOTE ]

Overpair vs. overpair in a SNG is an occupational hazard. It's a very bad idea to play scared of them. Make up your mind, and if you're wrong, just start another.


[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that his overbet is telling and if I got to that point a check-raise would work fine, but I hate checking that flop intially because it will often not be as clear to you what you should do.

While I understand you can't always fear the worst and operate under that assumption there is no reason we need to go broke against an overpair here in such a small pot. Why not lead the flop and make it relatively easy to find out if you're beat / take down the pot when ahead?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2005, 05:17 AM
HesseJam HesseJam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

I don't play the 50s but at the 25s at Stars you open limping pf with JJ is suboptimal. I standard-raise pf. If someone comes big over the top pf I usually fold. And I raise the flop and vary between a cont bet and a standard raise.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2005, 05:27 AM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bloomington , IN
Posts: 325
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

[ QUOTE ]
I think some people are going to call me crazy, but with no reads I fold this 100% of the time. Good luck against QQ+.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are crazy. Good luck making up for all the times villain has A7, 88-TT, AK or any hand that completely missed.
I agree with BigT that he should have raised preflop. You get a much better idea of where you are at.
This hand looks like it was played by someone who has been burned by JJ and is gunshy. The limp followed by the flop check is some very passive poker. You started with a strong hand, had a very favorable flop and you are scared. Why, because someone bet after you checked?
I strongly disagree with DPCondit about the mini raise. That does nothing to run off AK or a diamond draw, which are the 2 hands the OP should be most concerned about catching up to him.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2005, 06:19 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

Given your position preflop, I would raise, not limp. You're good on the flop, so get the money in however you think is best.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-07-2005, 07:22 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

thx for all the replys...very informative...btw i folded cause im a pussy....taking ball growth vitamins tho... [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2005, 11:24 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

[ QUOTE ]
Given your position preflop, I would raise, not limp. You're good on the flop, so get the money in however you think is best.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree that we're best alot right now, but if the money gets in I think we are best a minority of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2005, 11:27 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 360
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

On a 7-high, two-suited, minor possibility of straight draw flop? You're having a laugh, surely.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2005, 11:31 AM
bigt439 bigt439 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 134
Default Re: 55: i hate jacks!!

[ QUOTE ]
On a 7-high, two-suited, minor possibility of straight draw flop? You're having a laugh, surely.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the board's that dry then what gets it in against you?

EDIT: Hmmm, I'm thinking this over a bit and softening my stance somewhat. I just see no need to get stacked by QQ+ here with 75 bb's. Leading seems like a smart way to find out if your beat and get significant value out of hands you beat.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.