Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:27 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

I dunno, but, since he was the first one in and the original PF raiser, i think it kinda screams A-high. So he raises PF, calls the cap, calls the flop, calls a raised turn, I just dont see him calling the turn without the A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] here. Post the results......
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:27 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

I think this turn raise is spewing. Two other dudes already put money in on this street.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:31 PM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Between Two Hot Twins
Posts: 713
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

I would like this a lot more if it was heads up. I think this is just spewing.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:37 PM
Brom Brom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

I like the turn raise. It is a good bluff card. The problem is that smaller spades than yours will ditch, and bigger ones will almost certainly call with their perceived "redraw". IMO all of your outs are tainted and the move should be used more for fold equity than pot equity obviously. AK or AQ with a spade will call you probably.

I'd give up on the river and hope to take out maybe a JT type hand. I'd be more willing to bet any non-ace river. If you hope to fold a Nine, then I think you are mistaken. Anyone who calls that turn raise will call the river. Not terrible though. Did it work?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:41 PM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default The thing about my play...

Is that this pot is huge and not many people would expect a semi bluff here into two people. So yes, i think i can fold a naked nine, i think there is even a chance i can fold red tens or jacks from time to time with a 4 straight and 3 flush on the board. Maybe i am off on this, but this isnt some 1-2 game, people so find folds sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:44 PM
Brom Brom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2
Default Re: The thing about my play...

In what sense are they "marginal postflop", weak-tight? I find that people who are loose preflop will also be loose in calling down. Not always though.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:09 AM
lil feller lil feller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: The thing about my play...

[ QUOTE ]
Is that this pot is huge and not many people would expect a semi bluff here into two people. So yes, i think i can fold a naked nine, i think there is even a chance i can fold red tens or jacks from time to time with a 4 straight and 3 flush on the board. Maybe i am off on this, but this isnt some 1-2 game, people so find folds sometimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to assume that "marginal postflop" means that they pay some sort of attention as the hand progresses. You 3bet preflop, and got capped. What hand do you expect people to put you on when you pop the turn? A-Big of spades is the only sellable hand, and anybody w/ the A or K knows you can't have that, cuz they have one of your cards. They certainly aren't going to believe an 8, so the only way this has any chance is if nobody has the A or K of spades, nobody has an 8, and nobody has 2 pair. Furthermore, if these players have any history with you they'd know that you'd c/r 2 overs and flush draw on the flop 100% of the time, you didn't do that. The way you played this hand i'd put you on A-big with one spade. No other hand makes sense.

If you wanted this to work, I think you needed to set it up better on the flop, that or you and I have a very different idea of "marginal".

lf
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-04-2005, 12:53 AM
limon limon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: los angeles
Posts: 369
Default (almost) no one finds a fold here...

the reason being this play is so transparent on a draw board. you i and everybody else faces this a dozen times a day and goes into robo call down mode against all but the most passive foes. i win more money from habitual turn raisers than any other foe, i keep the stat front and center.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:24 AM
DpR DpR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 76
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

This is a 3BB bluff here. While I do think the board and situation is perfect for it (it appears you HAVE to have it) and it will definitely occasionally work, I do not think it will work enough.

That said, not betting this river would be so horrible. You spend 2 BB to buy bluff equity on the river, to not bet would make this entire hand absolutely terrible.

My gut says this is slightly -EV.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-04-2005, 03:17 AM
elindauer elindauer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: Cohnonas Grandes

hi ggbman,

Since you are going to call anyways, I like the raise. The pot is big, and who knows what's going to happen when you put in that raise on a 4-straight, 3-flush board in a protected pot. You certainly buy some fold equity, enough that the cost of the raise is probably worth it.

I hope it worked out for you.

-Eric
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.