Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-03-2005, 09:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[ QUOTE ]
Nuking Japan, undoubtedly, saved tens of thousands of American lives. But why did we feel the need to invade Japan? We had already destroyed their millitary as well as their economy. Would it not have been best if we just moved our troops out of the region and claimed victory?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what happened after WWI and that's part of the reason why WWII started.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-03-2005, 09:35 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

I started this much earlier but got sidelined by “She-who-must-be-obeyed.” Some of it’s been said but I’m not going to edit it.
<ul type="square"> **********************************[/list]


Assume we'd just declared victory and pulled out. The Japanese would have done what? Simply said, "OK, guys, that was a really bad idea we had there - that Pearl Harbor thingie. So maybe we oughta just forget the whole thing about taking over all of Asia, too. We can always figure out something to keep us busy."

They declared war on us. The way it came off really, really pissed off a lot of folks. Revenge/retaliation was the order of the day. They had to be made to pay.

FDR was having a real problem convincing the US that we should openly help fight Hitler and Il Duce. Didn't the Pearl Harbor attack get Hitler to declare war on the US? Now it's the Axis we're up against.

Look at the old propaganda material we generated to get everyone on board. We really did a job on portraying the evilness of the Axis. Pure hatred came out of the gentlest of people. If you’ve got any family members old enough to remember WWII, talk to them about what went on and how people thought/felt.

If Truman had done as you suggest I think he’d have been run out of town and up a lamp post, ala Il Duce.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-03-2005, 10:05 PM
Stu Pidasso Stu Pidasso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 779
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[ QUOTE ]

If you're going to fight a war, don't screw around with it. Destroy your enemy. Don't just hurt them and let them rebuild.


[/ QUOTE ]

If you want a relatively peaceful occupation you have to beat your enemy so badly that they no longer have any fight in them.

Stu
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:05 PM
lehighguy lehighguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 590
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

I'm not talking about Russia. Take that out of your mind.

What happens when you don't end a war?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:14 PM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

"Nuking Japan, undoubtedly, saved tens of thousands of American lives."

We've been over this ground several times in the last few years here. It is very likely the Japanese would have surrendered before the U.S. invasion even without the atomic bombs. The Soviet entry into the war was the key element. The Hiroshima bombing did not significantly change Japans's policy. And without the Soviet entry into the war, it is not likely that the Nagasaki bomb would have changed the situation. General Anami's warning that the U.S. might have 100 atomic bombs and that the next target might be Tokyo had no discernible impact on the debate in Japan about surrender.

The most likely scenario would have been that while waiting for the answer from Moscow about Soviet mediation with the U.S. about peace terms, Japan would have been shocked by the Soviet invasion in Manchuria sometime in the middle of August, and would have sued for peace on the Potsdam terms.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-04-2005, 08:34 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to fight a war, don't screw around with it. Destroy your enemy. Don't just hurt them and let them rebuild.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope Al Quaida find a way of dropping a nuclear bomb on the city you live in, then I'll post what you did, and see if it's met with the same apathy from the sycophants on this board.

You glorify the murder of civilians, and no one says a [censored] word, sick.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-04-2005, 10:58 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to fight a war, don't screw around with it. Destroy your enemy. Don't just hurt them and let them rebuild.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope Al Quaida find a way of dropping a nuclear bomb on the city you live in, then I'll post what you did, and see if it's met with the same apathy from the sycophants on this board.

You glorify the murder of civilians, and no one says a [censored] word, sick.

Mack

[/ QUOTE ]

Mack, I love you. AndyFox, excellent post.

I actually took an honors seminar a few years ago on just this topic. Most of the declassified docs (which included the internal debate on the issue) and other material from the time led me to believe (as well as the professor teaching the class) that the bomb wasn't as imperative as contemporary opinion thinks, and the the Soviet question was paramount in the decision.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-04-2005, 11:50 AM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

[ QUOTE ]
If you're going to fight a war, don't screw around with it. Destroy your enemy. Don't just hurt them and let them rebuild.

[/ QUOTE ]

Germany, Italy and Japan as the outlying Puerto Ricos of the American Empire?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-04-2005, 02:06 PM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Why even let them surrunder at all Dynasty? Why not just kill every last one of them?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:57 PM
Il_Mostro Il_Mostro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 72
Default Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

I guess we are all getting a bit to used to Dynasty posting stupid and/or discusting things and then not back them up. Sad but true.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.