![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's boring it means you're playing it better than most people.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like playing limit a lot more.
It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like: fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call. In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find negative variance boring.
Hello NL. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about Pot Limit?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like: fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call. In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO. [/ QUOTE ] huh? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No matter the stake, there's nothing more fun than having your top set/PF AA/nut straight check-raised in NL...In limit, even against the dullest player, you'll only get a few bets. [/ QUOTE ] yeah but in no limit the wpt douchebag that c/r you takes 37 mins per decision, meanwhile you are sitting there scratching your butt. In limit there is a flurry of chips being thrown in the pot, much faster and more fun. nothing worse than folding for two hours in a row and watching every hand take seven minutes. [/ QUOTE ] In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is virtually impossible at limit. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is nearly impossible at limit. [/ QUOTE ] basically, you missed the whole point. |
![]() |
|
|