|
|
#11
10-24-2005, 07:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Darn bottom set
damn you were quick to reply!! I edited the post because i didnt realise that
|
|
#12
10-24-2005, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
[ QUOTE ]
What's wrong with calling and waiting for a non-spade turn to bet/raise? [/ QUOTE ] Protect your hand. Letting Villain overcall with the nut draw at the right price isn't forcing them into a mistake. This isn't limit... you can set an incorrect price for your opposition, so you should take advantage of this.
|
|
#13
10-24-2005, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
Well he didn't know villian was interested in the hand
The way I see it, if the turn is a non-spade your equity is larger, and it's likely SB or BB will bet into you I don't mind giving up the pot ~20% of the time in order to be in this situation the other ~80% of the time edit: and you can still call a non-spade turn if you think some one has the Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
10-24-2005, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
[ QUOTE ]
I don't mind giving up the pot ~20% of the time in order to be in this situation the other ~80% of the time [/ QUOTE ] I'd rather have Villain be making a mistake by calling me. If he wants to get allin on the flop with ~30% equity against me, I'm happy. But I see your point.
|
|
#15
10-24-2005, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Results
Hero folds, like the scared little girl that he is. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#17
10-24-2005, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
He has only $10, I push here for sure.
|
|
#18
10-24-2005, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Results
Thats pretty much my feeling about it now that ive had some time for reflection too.
|
|
#19
10-24-2005, 08:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
I'm a little confused why everyone pretends someone doesn't have a made flush here. Its a limped pot. All sorts of suited connectors could have played here.
I think the one who raised played it exactly how someone with a weak made flush would play it. People seem to always think on a monotone flop that people are drawing for the flush, when in reality, a lot of people, particularly at the $25 tables, play any 2 suited. If this was a raised pot, it would be less likely to put someone on a flush (only because Ax and Kx would be out). Personally, I don't think this is the time to go nuts with bottom set.
|
|
#20
10-24-2005, 08:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Darn bottom set
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a little confused why everyone pretends someone doesn't have a made flush here. Its a limped pot. All sorts of suited connectors could have played here. I think the one who raised played it exactly how someone with a weak made flush would play it. People seem to always think on a monotone flop that people are drawing for the flush, when in reality, a lot of people, particularly at the $25 tables, play any 2 suited. If this was a raised pot, it would be less likely to put someone on a flush (only because Ax and Kx would be out). Personally, I don't think this is the time to go nuts with bottom set. [/ QUOTE ] fully agree
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
