|
|
#11
10-06-2005, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Where IS that \"he called me with!!!\" thread when you need it?
yes, vs a TAG this isnt good.
|
|
#13
10-06-2005, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Where IS that \"he called me with!!!\" thread when you need it?
[ QUOTE ]
He didn't coldcall. [/ QUOTE ] Check again. It looks like a cold-call to me. I don't mind it here. We have a decent hand, with position, against a maniac. A blind probably comes along as well. It might be better to just 3-bet, but cold-calling can't be that bad.
|
|
#14
10-07-2005, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Where IS that \"he called me with!!!\" thread when you need it?
[ QUOTE ]
I think now y'all understand why I give less credence to hand ranges than most, and advocate value betting so much more often [/ QUOTE ] Yep, this single hand proved it.
|
|
#15
10-07-2005, 12:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Where IS that \"he called me with!!!\" thread when you need it?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He didn't coldcall. [/ QUOTE ] Check again. It looks like a cold-call to me. I don't mind it here. We have a decent hand, with position, against a maniac. A blind probably comes along as well. It might be better to just 3-bet, but cold-calling can't be that bad. [/ QUOTE ] Ugh, I completely misread that opening. I thought that he had posted, but he was the button. Good thing I decided not to get up on the soapbox and say how much I think posting outside of BB in 6max is a bad idea [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
