#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part two. We see a turn HU
[ QUOTE ]
What range of hands would you now put PFR raiser on? I think he very likely has the flush draw probably with a little help like an overpair. The Tc looked like a perfect card where I can now value bet. If he fold's great but I think I'm probably ahead of his hand range now as well and can stand a call. Do you agree/disagree with the turn bet, if you agree what other non-spades would you bet here? [/ QUOTE ] I think the turn bet is fine. What non-spade would you not bet? Unless you can put him on a specific high pocket pair, there really isn't a turn card that you shouldn't be betting. If the Kd fell, are you suddenly going to give him credit for K-K-x-x and check. That would seem really weak. Even if a spade fell, you might consider a blocking bet. Some might call there with naked A-A-x-x and just give it up when the flush hits. BTW, C/R the nut flush draw after weak betting on an uncordinated board is one of my favorite moves, as it helps to get action from people with lower flushes if the turn completes the flush since they have now put you on a set. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Part two. We see a turn HU
That's what I was trying to figure myself, if there were any non-spades that would be dangerous to bet. Well the 8 I would probably give up cause I think he has an overpair to go along with the draw often. I would check and hope for a free river. Given villian's tightness I bet he has the nut flush draw when he is drawing so I can see maybe folding an A. Anything J or under I can't see a reason not to bet. The min-raise PF from someone who hasn't raised at all in a decent amount of hands to me probably means a pair of Q's or better trying to build a pot. But since I wouldn't know what pair I think I may have to bet them anyway.
|
|
|