#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Banning PT?
[ QUOTE ]
electricity doesnt think for me. perhaps it does for you. [/ QUOTE ] In that case, you certainly have a novel method of neural function. Care to explain it to us? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Banning PT?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] electricity doesnt think for me. perhaps it does for you. [/ QUOTE ] In that case, you certainly have a novel method of neural function. Care to explain it to us? [/ QUOTE ] you are either too deep and suggest going to the psych forum or too shallow in which i recommend the beginners forum. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Banning PT?
[ QUOTE ]
when a poker player needs a program to play poker, nah, this horse has been beat to death already. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, it has, and in threads where it was actually relevant, too. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Banning PT?
[ QUOTE ]
I have no idea where this sarcasm is coming from. Surely you can see the distinction between recording/analysing your own play and using automated systems to analyse and profile your opponents, often in real time? [/ QUOTE ] The post to which I responded made to reference to such things. He simply suggested that a poker player shouldn't need a program to play poker. Which is fine, but since I play primarily online, I find it extremely difficult to play without an operating system and a poker program such as the one provided by party poker or pokerstars. Also a browser is helpful otherwise I wouldn't have been able to get the poker programs in the first place or transfer money onto the sites. Of course, for a live game player, a computer program wouldn't be particularly necessary. Although I would suggest that much of your living functions are actually governed by a type of programing--bio-ware if you will... --Zetack |
|
|