A limp/reraise All In UTG can only mean one thing right?

[betgo]

[ QUOTE ]
i probaly fold though, if it was QQ i would call

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the difference? Does QQ play better against AA, KK, or AK than JJ? If villain is making a move with a smaller pair or suited connector, it doesn't matter either.

[Dave D]

Well I mean having QQ eliminates JJ as a threat and you're only worried about AA or KK. Having JJ means villian could have QQ, AA, or KK. There's less hands that I'm worried about, and more I dominate.

I dunno, it'd still be a tough call.


Incidently, I folded, and the other caller (of my 200) called w/ AK, UTG had TT, makes a set, but would have lost to my set.

Sigh.

[CardSharpCook]

there is no difference btwn QQ/JJ here. I usually call here.

[kuro]

This situation is tough. You need to consider the image of villains involved in the hand, your own image, and the ramifications of winning and losing and make a decision. Sometimes this is a clear fold and other times its a clear call, but most of the time it's murky.

I have a hard time believing that a donk massive overbets with AA here instead of just making a limp-standard reraise to try to induce an all-in or a call. I think you see limp-massive overbet more often with mid pairs and AQ/AK than KK/AA and it's pretty rare that you see someone play QQ this way.

I think I'd have to call here because you've got them both covered and you're probably ahead or flipping.

[TomHimself]

[ QUOTE ]
there is no difference btwn QQ/JJ here. I usually call here.

[/ QUOTE ]sure there is, you have more hands dominated KQ-AQ JJ-22