Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-03-2005, 01:19 PM
cadillac1234 cadillac1234 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 330
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

[ QUOTE ]
No doubt FEMA is partially to blame, but I seem to recall reading (sorry don't remember where. been reading a lot these last couple days) that FEMA was going to be more focused on terrorism responding and it's role in natural disasters would be mitigated to the state level and private sector. If this is the case, then it's hard to blame FEMA for everything when their role is being dramatically changed.

An interesting article from the WSJ.

[/ QUOTE ]


Then Bush's Administration is even more at fault for not planning a Natural Disaster Scenario into this new revamp. It is completely unimaginable that they would be so godam myopic regarding this.

BTW The Bush Admin's b/w view of problems has always been my biggest criticism
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2005, 01:25 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

How about this... I'll go have unprotected sex with a HIV positive female.

Then... when I get AIDS and I'm waiting to die... I'll expect sympathy from everyone that's been warning me for years to use a condom.

Then... my great distrust of the governement (liberal or conservative) that makes this country great will take over and I'll blame "___ insert current president 2010 here___" for my horrible condition.

How does that sound... because in 5 years when I'm dying of AIDS... it would mean a lot if the liberal or conservatives on this post helped me criticize the "___insert 2010 presdient here____"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-03-2005, 01:28 PM
BCPVP BCPVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 830
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

Keep in mind that we have hindsight on our sides now. The chances of this happening were not regarded as very high. And who's to say that FEMA hasn't prepared for natural disasters? My guess is that they got caught flatfooted when the hurricane got bigger and have had to deal with feeding/watering/supplying and evac'ing a city that is mostly underwater and few places to enter/exit as well as a surrounding area that has been ravaged by the same hurricane. Let's not forget that New Orleans is not the only place to get hit. Mississippi took the brunt of the hurricane and have been similarly wiped out. So you have devastation over a large area, a loss of many necessary utilities, a huge refugee problem, and to top it all off, gas that grows more expensive by the day! Needless to say, I think FEMA's in over it's head and probably treading water as fast as it can (which isn't to say it's fast enough).

Now that I think about it, most of the media coverage has been of New Orleans, while it is the coast of Mississippi that got hit the hardest. Hell, N.O. was at least able to evac most of it's people. How do you evacuate an entire coastline in any reasonable fasion?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-03-2005, 01:34 PM
newfant newfant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 637
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

[ QUOTE ]
How about this... I'll go have unprotected sex with a HIV positive female.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was just about to suggest that you do this.

New Orleans has been around for 100s of years. There was a potential for disaster there just like there is in many places in America. The federal government's slow response to this disaster was pathetic. That is the issue.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-03-2005, 02:47 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

You know what i don't understand... why does everyone (dems and conservs) want Bush to step up to the mic the mili-second he is informed of anything.

If you remember... when Clinton was President and a plane of U.S. Citizens was shot down by Cuba... he waited three days to issue a statement (which I thought was fine).

Obviously this is much worse than 4 citizens who didn't know how to follow their flight plan en route to vacation... but it brings up a good point.

Why is it when democrats are slow to respond they are; "gathering all the facts", "trying to make informed decisions", "trying to calm the public through adequete planning".

However, when a conservative doesn't immediately jump on TV they are: "dupping the public", "calious towards the needs of the poor", and "un-willing to address public out-cry".
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-03-2005, 02:55 PM
BluffTHIS! BluffTHIS! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 375
Default Re: The aftermath of this disaster was well-known

[ QUOTE ]
The federal government's slow response to this disaster was pathetic. That is the issue.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yea. The immediate criminal lawlessness that ensued by the scum of society had nothing whatsoever to do with it. And the coast guard rescuing thousands of poeple doesn't count cause they're not really part of the federal government. And the mayor's inept evacuation didn't have anything to do with it either. Neither did the governor's failure to immediately declare martial law and seek federal troops. Yep. All Bush's fault. Oh yeah, and 3-5 days is a huge amount of time to take getting supplies in past the gang bangers cause truckloads of supplies were just sitting on the outskirts of N.O. like they are outside every major city just in case.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.