#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
if i had the bankroll i would play the 1-2 at commerce no question. i could make significantly more per hour playing that game.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user *** [/ QUOTE ] i completely agree. well said. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
Take a road trip, find a nice game, play for 3 days, get your ass handed to you by some trash talking monkeys, end up $8,000 down, see how you feel. Add the sickening sh.it going on right now. Its a drag. Its not that he can't handle it, but like he said, its not pretty.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
If you won 8k, would this post have any mention of "the horrors of what is happening down south".
Commerce isn't for everyone man. It's OK. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately, just can't seem to win . . . been here 3 days, my focus is off because of the horrors of what is happening down south. Disgusted with this god-awful administration and the morons who run it. Just can't focus as something as trivial as poker. I'll take my 8k loss and hit the road. [/ QUOTE ] Respect your opinion TSP but not buying it at all. Saying you were just plain cold decked would be much more realistic and believable. I think if you had run really good the administration would have been an afterthought. I could be totally wrong, but an otherwise good player getting rocked playing 100-200 during this crisis and using the plight of the victims of one of our country's worst natural disasters as an excuse for losing is Bush. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] *** You are ignoring this user *** [/ QUOTE ] i completely agree. well said. [/ QUOTE ] This joke is getting old, and you're really missing out on some good stuff he has to say. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
"you're really missing out on some good stuff he has to say."
like what? he never said anything but obnoxious crap for the longest time. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
how can you know if it will take 1 trillon hands to know your win rate?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
"you're really missing out on some good stuff he has to say." like what? he never said anything but obnoxious crap for the longest time. [/ QUOTE ] yeah but he's actually posted some good stuff in the past 3 months or so. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Commerce 100-200 report. Not pretty . . . .
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Unfortunately, just can't seem to win . . . been here 3 days, my focus is off because of the horrors of what is happening down south. Disgusted with this god-awful administration and the morons who run it. Just can't focus as something as trivial as poker. I'll take my 8k loss and hit the road. [/ QUOTE ] Respect your opinion TSP but not buying it at all. Saying you were just plain cold decked would be much more realistic and believable. [/ QUOTE ] This is silly, TSP obviously knows he had a less than good deck during this period of play _but_ he also knows that he wasn't playing as well as possible because his focus was elsewhere. Losing $xk [in this case] isn't a product of just one of those reasons it's a product of both, had one of them been positive the amount would have been less. [ QUOTE ] I think if you had run really good the administration would have been an afterthought. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, obviously. If the cards were great he would have won regardless of how little focus he had, and yes, he wouldn't have 'blamed' his focus, this is human nature, how often do you check your game when running great? how often do you get mad at yourself for playing a hand like an idiot but winning it? |
|
|