Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-23-2005, 11:49 AM
Duffman Duffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Default Re: Which came first?

I believe the egg came first.

Your clone was running good at his table. If you sit at his table you'll do good. Otherwise he'll get the same crappy cards you were getting at your table.

That made no sense.

Here we are at 2+2, one of the best poker forums out there, and definitely the best poker book publisher out there, and we're discussing luck and running good. Awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:12 PM
Greg J Greg J is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Baton rouge LA
Posts: 10
Default Re: Which came first?

I think as long as you don't touch him you will be fine. You saw Timecop right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:25 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Not a stupid question.

This isn't about the cards, you retardos. It's about whether you -- yeah, I'm talking to YOU -- play better when you're running g00t or running bad, and whether your clone would be smart enough to adjust his game to the fact that you had been running bad at the table (i.e., the bluffs and steals he could make will probably just be spewy at your table).

All else being equal, Grisgra running good is probably playing slightly better than Grisgra running bad, and my clone would be able to adjust for the fact that he was coming to a table where I had been running bad . . . so I'll let the clone do the work while I catch up on my Tivo.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-23-2005, 12:34 PM
Duffman Duffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Default Re: Not a stupid question.

Well wouldn't your clone start playing just as bad as you once he realizes he's running bad?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2005, 01:27 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: Not a stupid question.

[ QUOTE ]
Well wouldn't your clone start playing just as bad as you once he realizes he's running bad?

[/ QUOTE ]

Who says he's going to run bad just because you *were* running bad?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-23-2005, 02:28 PM
Duffman Duffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 95
Default Re: Not a stupid question.

Oh ok now I see what you're saying.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-23-2005, 02:49 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: sittin on my 6xbuy-in stack
Posts: 690
Default Re: Which came first?

[ QUOTE ]
Everyone who has responded to this thread is retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:35 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: Not a stupid question.

[ QUOTE ]
Oh ok now I see what you're saying.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. As I was saying, this isn't a stupid question at all -- a losing session can knock some people from their A-game into their B-game, or their B-game into their C- or D-game. Or worse. This is just a creative/silly way of thinking about how well you play when running good vs running bad, and how well you adjust your game when running good vs running bad. Completely non-trivial concerns.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:41 PM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Default Re: Which came first?

[ QUOTE ]
Something I was thinking about on the way home from the bar.

Scenario:

You are in the middle of a cold streak. Halfway through a session in which you are losing, your clone who is running incredibly good takes over for you. What happens?

-Jason

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate questions in which vital information is not provided. This is worse than the no read on opponents hand questions.

The answer to this question has a lot to do with what point in your life your clone was made.

For instance I've been playing poker for two years, so a clone made after I've started playing would still be an infant and probably not a good player, I don't care how hot a streak he's been on. A clone made shortly after my birth would have such different life experiences that there's no way to predict what kind of poker player he'd be. For all I know, this session today that he's running so well in, is his first session ever...


--Zetack
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-23-2005, 03:59 PM
JasonM JasonM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 79
Default Clone may have been a bad word to use...

I wasn't really thinking in terms of an actual clone, more of your clone as a poker player. Someone who is the same skill level, plays the same, thinks the same... (someone who plays exactly like you)

-Jason
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.