Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-23-2005, 05:16 AM
JTG51 JTG51 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 3,746
Default Re: Not Optimum: Hand 1

[ QUOTE ]
Against a range of opponent hands restricted to exactly AA/KK/QQ/AKs/AKo/AQs my TT wins 38.4% of the time HU.

[/ QUOTE ]

Guys that raise 7% of their hands preflop don't 3-bet AQs and probably don't 3-bet AKs either.



[ QUOTE ]
So I need pot odds of 2.6:1 (72.33:27.67 to be exact) to make this call profitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a bigger problem. You're not all in preflop, so you can't just look at preflop equity when deciding if you should play.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-23-2005, 07:08 AM
naphand naphand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UK
Posts: 550
Default Re: Not Optimum: Hand 1

I think a lot of them will 3-bet AKs, AQs is doubtful I agree.

As for the pot equity, using all-in simulations is problematic of course but for the purposes of argument it is useful to see where I stand.

The all-in argument presumes all things being equal post-flop i.e. I neither make a net gain or loss playing the hand to SD versus my opponents. If I consider myself a capable player post-flop then the argument is reasonably valid IMO.

Your point is not lost though, but I do not think we should dismiss the all-in simulation - it at least forms a starting point for discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-23-2005, 07:53 AM
Innocentius Innocentius is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vatican sewers
Posts: 118
Default Re: Not Optimum: Hand 1

[ QUOTE ]

If UTG+1 caps, when it is back to me I will be comfortably getting odds to call again.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is another problem with calling three cold. When you consider your odds, you have to take this possibility into consideration. Say that we are sure that UTG+1 is going to cap. Then the odds we are getting are actually 10.33:4 or 2.58:1. Of course, you cannot be sure of this, but the possibility makes your odds slimmer than the 2.78:1 you get from assuming that he will call.

Also, I think the likely hand range of MP here is more like AA/KK/QQ/AKs. This has you in bad shape.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:20 PM
Erik W Erik W is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Not Optimum: Hand 1

Fold PF
Fold Flop
Raise River

1 right out of 3

With the action he have KK/AA (95%).
Since a king is out there is 3 ways he have KK and 6 ways AA
so that is 67% AA. Since he played it so strongly and did not fear KK anywhere I'd say it is more like 75/25 so raise river and call a 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:51 PM
Dagger78 Dagger78 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 23
Default Re: Not Optimum: Hand 1

Alright, I fold this pre-flop. You MAY be ahead, but alot of flops could be very difficult to play if your hand is best. Plus you're not getting odds to flop a set.

So since we make it to the turn, I think calling actually gets you more info than raising this time. If you call and UTG raises, and MP1 caps, you can fold (at least I would). If you call and UTG calls, you can raise any non diamond, three or overcard turn.

MP1's hand confuses me, I really have no idea what he has, I think it's time for a flat call on the river, but as I've previously stated I'm a wuss.

Personally, this hand should have been over with the pre-flop fold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.