![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 30/17 player beat the 30/60 for a very solid amount for a very long time. Of course some figure he cheats, or is just the luckiest sob on the planet. We had a ~400 post thread discussing this.
DERB: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...mp;o=&vc=1 2nd |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Well, we are definately talking about the Party 30/60. And my PRF% is 28.72 But, alas, I am talking about 3 or 4 handed [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Ah, ok. Makes sense now. Our numbers are very similar then... with the exception of comparing our win rates. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Cheers, Nigel |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any update on DERB? Still winning?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would'nt the inflection point be where you go from max BB/hr and start dropping, not where you cross the graph to negative?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Would'nt the inflection point be where you go from max BB/hr and start dropping, not where you cross the graph to negative? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Any update on DERB? Still winning? [/ QUOTE ] We'll never know for sure. Once party lifted the restriction on the number of 30/60 tables, it was no longer possible to log virtually every hand from a given player. I believe someone said he was playing more shorthanded lately. I don't know personally. I've been playing the party 30/60 here and there and haven't seen him. 2nd |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No one has an idea of a number?
-Scott |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
No one has an idea of a number? -Scott [/ QUOTE ] Scott, The dialogue between myself and Scott illustrates the need to define the question a little more. Are we talking full-ring only 9-10 players? Nigel |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
28.
<font color="white"> I'm talking out my ass </font> |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Would'nt the inflection point be where you go from max BB/hr and start dropping, not where you cross the graph to negative? [/ QUOTE ] Depends on what graph you are looking at. |
![]() |
|
|