|
|
#11
08-18-2005, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand Test --- What Would You Do Here?
I wouldn't go all in with the 88 but I think I would have called the raise just to see the flop. No 8 or if there were any overcards on flop I would have folded to any raise thereafter. Calling the additional 350 is about 18% of your stack and you wouldn't really be hurting too bad with $1500 in chips in the SB after the call and fold.
|
|
#12
08-18-2005, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hand Test --- What Would You Do Here?
[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't go all in with the 88 but I think I would have called the raise just to see the flop. No 8 or if there were any overcards on flop I would have folded to any raise thereafter. Calling the additional 350 is about 18% of your stack and you wouldn't really be hurting too bad with $1500 in chips in the SB after the call and fold. [/ QUOTE ] No offense, but I think this is the worst possible way to play it. I think folding is the best option, but only marginally ahead of reraising. Calling 1/5 of your stack to see if you flop a set is a terrible way to play.
|
|
#13
08-18-2005, 10:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hand Test --- What Would You Do Here?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wouldn't go all in with the 88 but I think I would have called the raise just to see the flop. No 8 or if there were any overcards on flop I would have folded to any raise thereafter. Calling the additional 350 is about 18% of your stack and you wouldn't really be hurting too bad with $1500 in chips in the SB after the call and fold. [/ QUOTE ] No offense, but I think this is the worst possible way to play it. I think folding is the best option, but only marginally ahead of reraising. Calling 1/5 of your stack to see if you flop a set is a terrible way to play. [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
