|
|
#11
08-11-2005, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River Checkraise: wicked, weak, or standard?
[ QUOTE ]
He has an A here about 90% of the time, or else he would fold the turn. So the checkraise is fine. [/ QUOTE ] 90% is a gross overestimate, imo. he has a pair+draw combo here alot which he will call a bet with but check behind with. 
|
|
#12
08-11-2005, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River Checkraise: wicked, weak, or standard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He has an A here about 90% of the time, or else he would fold the turn. So the checkraise is fine. [/ QUOTE ] 90% is a gross overestimate, imo. he has a pair+draw combo here alot which he will call a bet with but check behind with. [/ QUOTE ] He raised preflop too. I think 90% is an overestimation, but I think he will bet at least 75% when checked to.
|
|
#14
08-11-2005, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: River Checkraise: wicked, weak, or standard?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] BTW, I really miss a working converter. [/ QUOTE ] when i take the "Texas" out of the "Texas Holdem" phrase at the top of the hand history it works everytime for me. [/ QUOTE ] I wonder how many times this will have to be posted before the forum realizes it? [/ QUOTE ] you read my mind. i feel like there should be a sticky for it. [/ QUOTE ] I actually did do this and it still sucks ass.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
