![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I think the major problem is, OOT Is the most popular forum, so all the Mods are in it, because they are posters just like us; too many chefs in the kitchen and all. [/ QUOTE ] Only OOT mods can move, delete, or lock threads in here. I thought this was fairly common knowledge on 2+2. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think the major problem is, OOT Is the most popular forum, so all the Mods are in it, because they are posters just like us; too many chefs in the kitchen and all. [/ QUOTE ] Only OOT mods can move, delete, or lock threads in here. I thought this was fairly common knowledge on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] Is this true? So I can tell you to go [censored] yourself? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Thanks, good to know actually. My brain was still stuck on gimmick account bannings. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
actually according to precedent you can tell him to go f[/u]ck himself
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
actually according to precedent you can tell him to go f[/u]ck himself [/ QUOTE ] haha..dude you are so bitter. Listen to some mellow Under The Table and Dreaming or something and take a chill man. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you should relax.
its a [censored] internet forum. go ride a bike for a day or something. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
your loc explains it all.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. They are better in the long run. Your poll wasn't that interesting anyways.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Overall, I think having mods is a great move for 2+2, but I can't see any positive from having them be anonymous. This is a community and it makes sense to have some people help keep the community within reasonable standards. I think any good mod would be willing to take responsibility for his judgement calls. If they make a mistake, they can accept feedback from the community and get better at their task. Hell, even the guy who banned SpicyF due to a personal squabble outside of 2+2 has been reinstated as a mod. I can't think of a worse abuse of power by a mod, yet that received just a little slap on the wrist. If mods have such complete authority over the community, at least let them be accountable for their actions (via their anonymous online personas!). As things stand, anonymous mods sort of act in a vacuum, making it tougher for a good status quo to be achieved.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Overall, I think having mods is a great move for 2+2, but I can't see any positive from having them be anonymous. This is a community and it makes sense to have some people help keep the community within reasonable standards. I think any good mod would be willing to take responsibility for his judgement calls. If they make a mistake, they can accept feedback from the community and get better at their task. Hell, even the guy who banned SpicyF due to a personal squabble outside of 2+2 has been reinstated as a mod. I can't think of a worse abuse of power by a mod, yet that received just a little slap on the wrist. If mods have such complete authority over the community, at least let them be accountable for their actions (via their anonymous online personas!). As things stand, anonymous mods sort of act in a vacuum, making it tougher for a good status quo to be achieved. [/ QUOTE ] This is a real good post. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shut up. YOU SHUT UP.
Delete this thread. |
![]() |
|
|