Joe Hachem hand from Main Event

[bugstud]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hachem - AA
SB - J10s

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, that would mean that SB has the nuts, and therefore would have to have been a complete idiot for not reraising on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

and the description of the SB prevents this?

[burningyen]

I would put SB on AQ, maybe AK. I can't see a nervous (= weak-tight?) player with anything smaller than a big 2-pair by the turn.

I would put Hachem on QQ or JT, even though I know KK is more logical. That long pause and raise on the turn feels like "holy $#!+, I hit my gin card" to me.

[durron597]

Hatchem knows this player will call down, so he has no problem betting his AA.

Donk has KQ.

Edit: I also would not be surprised at all if Hatchem had JTs. Donk *definitely* has KQ though. I would put KK in Hatchem's range also but given that Donk has KQ those are unlikely.

Now that I think about it more I like Hatchem having JTs more and more.

[AACardPlayer]

They both got AK and chop the pot.

[Prime Time]

I smell set over set.

[burningyen]

I don't see how you guys read SB as having something like A3 or KQ. All we know is he's a nervous slowplayer.

[sekrah]

[ QUOTE ]
They both got AK and chop the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]


BINGO! I think you just hit the nail on the head. Either A-Q or A-K.. Chop the pot.

[GBslyr]

Hachem: ak
SB= kq

[MLG]

the river bet screams I have a hand that I want to check fold, but its a good hand. So I'm going to bet and hope you jsut call. Now that you raised, I want to fold, but you might be bluffing, and my hand is pretty good, and I really want to know what you have, so I call.

Underbetting mediocre hands and then calling a raise is one of the most salient characteristics of NL players our of their depth.

[beetyjoose]

So what was the outcome? Let's hear it.