#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
Danny is indirectly responsible for the death of Niebaum because he knew that the crooked cops would come after the Inspector. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think that legally makes you responsible for murder. Danny lied, but the assassins still took their own course of action. If I tell a buddy I think his wife might be cheating on him, and he in turn kills her, am I liable for her death? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
If I tell a buddy I think his wife might be cheating on him, and he in turn kills her, am I liable for her death? [/ QUOTE ] In some cases, yes, particularly if you were lying and/or if it could be shown that the outcome was obvious or that you should have know it would be, then you could be charged with something like Criminal Negligance Causing Death (at least) if not Conspiracy. Especially if it could be proven that your intent was to trick your buddy into killing his wife. For example, if you knew your buddy had previously tried to kill women he'd been in relationships with. Or if you had previously threatend the wife yourself. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Danny is indirectly responsible for the death of Niebaum because he knew that the crooked cops would come after the Inspector. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think that legally makes you responsible for murder. Danny lied, but the assassins still took their own course of action. If I tell a buddy I think his wife might be cheating on him, and he in turn kills her, am I liable for her death? [/ QUOTE ] If you knew that he was very likely going to kill her if he found out(he had a very violent personality, and would kill cheaters), then yes, I would say that you are indirectly liable for her death if you tell him and do not call the police. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
if it could be shown that the outcome was obvious or that you should have know it would be, then you could be charged with something like Criminal Negligance Causing Death (at least) if not Conspiracy. Especially if it could be proven that your intent was to trick your buddy into killing his wife. [/ QUOTE ] My analogy doesn't fit perfectly. Back to the movie though, it's unlikely that they could prove Danny's intent was to get Neibaum killed, since it was Neibaum who had the information Danny needed. He might be guilty of some form of negligence, but that seems like it would come in behind taking hostages and setting fire to a federal building. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
It was a good movie.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
I haven't seen the movie but my understanding is that if you rob a 7-11 and while you are robbing it a customer slips and hits his head and dies or has a heart attack you get charged with felony murder.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
I haven't seen the movie but my understanding is that if you rob a 7-11 and while you are robbing it a customer slips and hits his head and dies or has a heart attack you get charged with felony murder. [/ QUOTE ] Kind of. There still has to be a causal connection, but in either of those cases, the victim simply being aware of the burglary would probably be enough to fill that requirement. For the heart attack case, it's clear -- Victim sees Felon robbing 7-11, Victim has heart attack, Victim dies. A jury could easily find that Victim was literally scared to death. For the slip-fall-die guy, well, you'd have to see something more (but not much). If Victim slipped because he was trying to run from or hide from Felon, that should be enough -- and again, that is probably something a jury could rationally infer. But you are painting with two broad a brush. Imagine a situation where Felon goes into a 7-11, sticks up the joint, and while that happens, Victim, unaware of the goings on at the register, slips on a Slurpee spill, cracks his head open, and dies. If that's the case, there's no conviction for felony murder. The thing is that, most of the time, the facts of the case are not so cut and dried. The prosecution could very easily allege that the Victim did, indeed, know that the burglary was going on (7-11s are not usually all that large, and one can notice a masked gunman from pretty much anywhere in the store). So, take this example: Guy walks into a Super WalMart. Goes to register #1, located in the far southeast corner of the square mile megaplex. Holds up the cashier at gunpoint. Meanwhile, a guy in the gun section suddendly trips over his own shoelaces and falls jugular-first onto a bayonet. Felon? Sure -- armed robbery is a felony, and one for which felony murder usually applies. Death? Clearly. Felony Murder? No way, and it isn't even close. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I haven't seen the movie but my understanding is that if you rob a 7-11 and while you are robbing it a customer slips and hits his head and dies or has a heart attack you get charged with felony murder. [/ QUOTE ] Kind of. There still has to be a causal connection, but in either of those cases, the victim simply being aware of the burglary would probably be enough to fill that requirement. For the heart attack case, it's clear -- Victim sees Felon robbing 7-11, Victim has heart attack, Victim dies. A jury could easily find that Victim was literally scared to death. For the slip-fall-die guy, well, you'd have to see something more (but not much). If Victim slipped because he was trying to run from or hide from Felon, that should be enough -- and again, that is probably something a jury could rationally infer. But you are painting with two broad a brush. Imagine a situation where Felon goes into a 7-11, sticks up the joint, and while that happens, Victim, unaware of the goings on at the register, slips on a Slurpee spill, cracks his head open, and dies. If that's the case, there's no conviction for felony murder. The thing is that, most of the time, the facts of the case are not so cut and dried. The prosecution could very easily allege that the Victim did, indeed, know that the burglary was going on (7-11s are not usually all that large, and one can notice a masked gunman from pretty much anywhere in the store). So, take this example: Guy walks into a Super WalMart. Goes to register #1, located in the far southeast corner of the square mile megaplex. Holds up the cashier at gunpoint. Meanwhile, a guy in the gun section suddendly trips over his own shoelaces and falls jugular-first onto a bayonet. Felon? Sure -- armed robbery is a felony, and one for which felony murder usually applies. Death? Clearly. Felony Murder? No way, and it isn't even close. [/ QUOTE ] As a practicing attorney, I must say it looks like you did well on the bar. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
I hope you're right [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Legal ramifications of \'The Negotiator\'
Niebaum was responsible for his own death.
|
|
|