|
|
#11
07-25-2005, 10:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: playing a rock?
Rocks don't steal. Am I misreading the post, isn't this guy like 9/6??
-DeathDonkey 
|
|
#13
07-25-2005, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
Rocks don't steal. Am I misreading the post, isn't this guy like 9/6?? -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] i agree. i don't think i can 3-bet him for that reason. i was thinking along the lines of aaron's post, ie, that he has overcards a lot more than a big pair here.
|
|
#14
07-25-2005, 11:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
Rocks don't steal. Am I misreading the post, isn't this guy like 9/6?? [/ QUOTE ] Hmm. I guess it would have been nice if we knew how many hands tilt had on this guy to get those numbers, but they make this guy seem more like a rock than the TAG that was our hero's original read. It would be interesting if someone that had Pokerstove compared our hand with a likely range of hands for someone with a PFR of 7. Getting 5:1 closing the action, this still seems like a profitable call but I don't have the numbers to back it up right now.
|
|
#15
07-25-2005, 11:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Rocks don't steal. Am I misreading the post, isn't this guy like 9/6?? [/ QUOTE ] Hmm. I guess it would have been nice if we knew how many hands tilt had on this guy to get those numbers, but they make this guy seem more like a rock than the TAG that was our hero's original read. It would be interesting if someone that had Pokerstove compared our hand with a likely range of hands for someone with a PFR of 7. Getting 5:1 closing the action, this still seems like a profitable call but I don't have the numbers to back it up right now. [/ QUOTE ] he's a tight aggressive rock. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] he is 9/6, his agg. was something like 2.5-3ish. i had about 200 hands with him yesterday.
|
|
#17
07-25-2005, 11:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yuck. This is closer to a preflop fold than anything else. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] This is closer to a preflop 3-bet than it is to a preflop fold. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he's got ~200 hands on this guy (which he mentioned) it's closer to a preflop fold than a 3-bet and it's an easy fold if you're routinely trying to outplay tightttttttt aggressive players on flops like this. Basically, the Donkey is correct on this one. Rob
|
|
#18
07-25-2005, 11:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yuck. This is closer to a preflop fold than anything else. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] This is closer to a preflop 3-bet than it is to a preflop fold. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he's got ~200 hands on this guy (which he mentioned) it's closer to a preflop fold than a 3-bet and it's an easy fold if you're routinely trying to outplay tightttttttt aggressive players on flops like this. Basically, the Donkey is correct on this one. Rob [/ QUOTE ] doh. i call too much out of the blinds it seems.
|
|
#20
07-25-2005, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: playing a rock?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yuck. This is closer to a preflop fold than anything else. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] This is closer to a preflop 3-bet than it is to a preflop fold. [/ QUOTE ] No. If he's got ~200 hands on this guy (which he mentioned) it's closer to a preflop fold than a 3-bet and it's an easy fold if you're routinely trying to outplay tightttttttt aggressive players on flops like this. Basically, the Donkey is correct on this one. Rob [/ QUOTE ] doh. i call too much out of the blinds it seems. [/ QUOTE ] Don't get me wrong. I think the preflop call is fine here. But I think the intent of outplaying a player who has a very narrow range in general here on this flop is pretty bad. Rob
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
