#1
|
|||
|
|||
question for the anti-war guys - NOT A FLAME
Been reading a lot of the war arguments, and you make some solid points. Most importantly, I don't believe anyone involved in this mess is telling the whole truth, especially my own government. There's one string of logic I can't get past in the case for war though:
1. Saddam Hussein is a bad dude (I think we're all in agreement here). 2. The world has asked him to disarm (we all know the resolutions). 3. He will not disarm. So what world do we live in if we collectively ask a bad dude to disarm, he gives the world the finger, and he faces no repurcussions? Honestly, this is not a flame. I just want to know how you guys resolve that logic string to conclude that no war is still the best approach? If not war, how do you deal with Saddam's insolence? |
|
|