|
|
#11
07-18-2005, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10/20 (6max) on Party
[ QUOTE ]
at 2.5 BB/100 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] but come on, those tables are the biggest circus in town. [/ QUOTE ] How many hands? How could someone making so much money at these games bitch about them? 
|
|
#13
07-18-2005, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 (6max) on Party
[ QUOTE ]
That is at only 6k hands [/ QUOTE ] Surprise, surprise. [ QUOTE ] I know small sample size don't need all you math geeks pointing that out to me. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not particularly interested in pointing it out to you; I just wanted to make sure that everyone else knew that you were referencing extremely short-term results. Based on what I've read it's not reasonable for you to expect to beat the Party $10/20 6max for 2.5 BB/100 over any meaningful sample.
|
|
#14
07-18-2005, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 (6max) on Party
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Explain. Why so dif from the 5/10 short? (i suck shorthanded as a whole, so even the 5/10short kicks my ass). [/ QUOTE ] WARNING: HERE COMES A GENERALIZATION... I can fold with a light heart at most 5/10 turn checkraises while 10/20 checkraises have a slew of hairball possibilities. [/ QUOTE ] well put [/ QUOTE ] agreed
|
|
#16
07-19-2005, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 (6max) on Party
[ QUOTE ]
Based on what I've read it's not reasonable for you to expect to beat the Party $10/20 6max for 2.5 BB/100 over any meaningful sample. [/ QUOTE ] I believe a 2 to 3 BB is attainable and sustainable. I've gone thru some wicked swings up and down. With over 50K hands played, I was in this range. Table selection is paramount IMO.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
