Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-14-2005, 05:24 PM
Catt Catt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 998
Default Re: A series of defenses vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the analysis Catt, I'd say you play each of those pretty well. The only comment I have is if I check/raised you on the turn for Hand 3 when that J hit, a 3bet on your part seems a bit excessive. That line would be screaming monster or big bluff, and a 3-bet doesn't help in either case since with a monster I'll cap, and a weak hand like 44 I'll fold. An argument could be made for 3-betting with the intention to check through the river, but if that's the case then you might as well induce another bet from me on the river.

Other than that... ni hans!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, a three bet on your turn C/R would be bad. I might still stupidly have done so in this case given the circumstances (the two prior hands we played) since I felt you wouldn't fold a losing hand to the three-bet and would see a showdown for 2 more in a 12 BB pot (or fold UI on the river if you held something like Ax with a pair) -- but clearly the odds would be pretty bad since I don't think you could give yourself 5 clean outs even if you had pair + overcard instead of a small PP, and you'd either be folding or capping (and I would credit you with a set and fold to the cap). 3-betting a turn C/R would not have been smart at all.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-14-2005, 05:26 PM
JrJordan JrJordan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: A series of defenses vs. TAG

So let's back track a step...

I would fold to your turn 3-bet, and you would fold to my turn cap.

Moral of the story: GAMBOOOL = ++EV!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-14-2005, 05:32 PM
Catt Catt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 998
Default Re: A series of defenses vs. TAG

Forgot to ask -- C/Ring the double gutter on the flop in Hand 2 was nice and I didn't even consider QT as a possible holding. Were you continuing by betting any turn card there?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-14-2005, 05:40 PM
JrJordan JrJordan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: A series of defenses vs. TAG

[ QUOTE ]
Forgot to ask -- C/Ring the double gutter on the flop in Hand 2 was nice and I didn't even consider QT as a possible holding. Were you continuing by betting any turn card there?

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks, but I don't think I deserve it. The more I think about it, the more I feel this should be a check/call situation. There's just too many draws and made hands that you could have here for me to have any real folding equity.

The way I played it though, I think I have to follow up on the turn around 95% of the time to take advantage of what folding equity I have anyway. I'm calling your bet anyway, so I just have to hope you don't pull another flop smoothcall, turn raise on me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.