Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-10-2005, 10:26 PM
[censored] [censored] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: Newsweek: Rove was the leaker

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Rove already served his purpose, this is just a bump in the road.


[/ QUOTE ]

You greatly underestimate Rove's role in the current administration.

[/ QUOTE ]

No I understand how the administration works and how politics work. I am not some liberal wack job who focuses too much energy on just one person not wanting to admit that they were getting beat before Karl Rove and will continue to get beat long after Karl Rove.

Of course these same wack jobs put too much emphasis on guys like Newt Gengrich and Rush Limbaugh. Anything to avoid aknowledging their failed ideology.

These days they focus on Tom Delay, Karl Rove and Fox news.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-10-2005, 10:34 PM
Exsubmariner Exsubmariner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now Declassified
Posts: 71
Default From the rest of the article.


[ QUOTE ]
The e-mail characterizing the conversation continues: "not only the genesis of the trip is flawed an[d] suspect but so is the report. he [Rove] implied strongly there's still plenty to implicate iraqi interest in acquiring uranium fro[m] Niger ... "

Story continues below ↓
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing in the Cooper e-mail suggests that Rove used Plame's name or knew she was a covert operative . Nonetheless, it is significant that Rove was speaking to Cooper before Novak's column appeared; in other words, before Plame's identity had been published. Fitzgerald has been looking for evidence that Rove spoke to other reporters as well. "Karl Rove has shared with Fitzgerald all the information he has about any potentially relevant contacts he has had with any reporters, including Matt Cooper," Luskin told NEWSWEEK.

A source close to Rove, who declined to be identified because he did not wish to run afoul of the prosecutor or government investigators, added that there was "absolutely no inconsistency" between Cooper's e-mail and what Rove has testified to during his three grand-jury appearances in the case. "A fair reading of the e-mail makes clear that the information conveyed was not part of an organized effort to disclose Plame's identity, but was an effort to discourage Time from publishing things that turned out to be false," the source said, referring to claims in circulation at the time that Cheney and high-level CIA officials arranged for Wilson's trip to Africa.



[/ QUOTE ]
Karl has nothing to worry about. Once again, we see the truth twisted/omitted by the seminar democratic lefty operatives who work this board to undermine the President of the United States.
X
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-10-2005, 10:38 PM
AngryCola AngryCola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wichita
Posts: 999
Default Re: From the rest of the article.

[ QUOTE ]
work this board to undermine the President of the United States.

[/ QUOTE ]


Hahahahahahahahaha!

Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhh...


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

-End logical argument-
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-10-2005, 10:39 PM
whiskeytown whiskeytown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 700
Default Re: Newsweek: Rove was the leaker

Rove said that someone's wife is a CIA operative -

BUT he didn't use her name.... - just said he was the ambassador's wife - so TECHINCALLY, he didn't name her - sorry - but the prosecution ain't gonna see it that way..

what a [censored] lawyer - LOL - stick a fork in Rove - he's done - (thank god) till he becomes a political advisor behind the scenes in the next election.

RB
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-10-2005, 10:43 PM
fluxrad fluxrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Peruvian highlands.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: From the rest of the article.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Nothing in the Cooper e-mail suggests that Rove used Plame's name or knew she was a covert operative...

[/ QUOTE ]


Karl has nothing to worry about. Once again, we see the truth twisted/omitted by the seminar democratic lefty operatives who work this board to undermine the President of the United States.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right. He just said Wilson's Wife. But since he didn't actually say her name everything's copacetic.

Do you happen to know what the definition of the word "is" is, by chance?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-10-2005, 11:36 PM
Exsubmariner Exsubmariner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now Declassified
Posts: 71
Default Re: From the rest of the article.

I thought the definition was whatever Bill Clinton needed it to be to get out of getting caught in a lie....
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-11-2005, 03:37 AM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: Newsweek: Rove was the leaker

plausable deniability.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-11-2005, 07:26 AM
Broken Glass Can Broken Glass Can is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: GWB is a man of True Character
Posts: 718
Default Re: From the rest of the article.

From the Washington Post. Why Rove has nothing to worry about:

"White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove spoke with at least one reporter about Valerie Plame's role at the CIA before she was identified as a covert agent in a newspaper column two years ago, but Rove's lawyer said yesterday that his client did not identify her by name.

To be considered a violation of the law, a disclosure by a government official must have been deliberate, the person doing it must have known that the CIA officer was a covert agent, and he or she must have known that the government was actively concealing the covert agent's identity.

Rove's conversation with Cooper could be significant because it indicates a White House official was discussing Plame prior to her being publicly named and could lead to evidence of how Novak learned her name.

"Rove did not mention her name to Cooper," Luskin said. "This was not an effort to encourage Time to disclose her identity. What he was doing was discouraging Time from perpetuating some statements that had been made publicly and weren't true."

By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 11, 2005; Page A01
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-11-2005, 09:47 AM
fluxrad fluxrad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Peruvian highlands.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: From the rest of the article.

BGC, are you daft?

He didn't mention her name. He said, as was stated in the Newsweek article, it was "Wilson's wife" when talking about the ambassador.

Out of curiosity, how many people do you think that might have narrowed the field down to? Is the ambassador mormon? Does the ambassador have a second family living somewhere that we don't know about? Seriously. I'm honestly asking you: Which of Wilson's wives do you think Rove was talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-11-2005, 09:53 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Newsweek: Rove was the leaker

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Rove already served his purpose, this is just a bump in the road.


[/ QUOTE ]

You greatly underestimate Rove's role in the current administration.

[/ QUOTE ]

No I understand how the administration works and how politics work. I am not some liberal wack job who focuses too much energy on just one person not wanting to admit that they were getting beat before Karl Rove and will continue to get beat long after Karl Rove.

Of course these same wack jobs put too much emphasis on guys like Newt Gengrich and Rush Limbaugh. Anything to avoid aknowledging their failed ideology.

These days they focus on Tom Delay, Karl Rove and Fox news.

[/ QUOTE ]

And "conservative wack jobs" have been after Bill and Hillary Clinton for more than decade. What's your point.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.