Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:25 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, no, I totally disagree.

Loosing up in the 5s is sort of the dumbest strategy I've heard yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe it's because you play on Eurobet and not Stars or UB. this is'nt a Eurobet or Party hand where you this play might not be all that great.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:18 PM
tminus tminus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 403
Default Re: Too Tight?

sorry but i disagree with this
I dont think ATo is a good hand to raise with when 5 people are left to act
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:18 PM
tminus tminus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 403
Default Re: Too Tight?

sorry but i disagree with this
I dont think ATo is a good hand to raise with when 5 people are left to act

id fold
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:29 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]
sorry but i disagree with this
I dont think ATo is a good hand to raise with when 5 people are left to act

id fold

[/ QUOTE ]

and there's nothing wrong with your play. do you, dawg. however, i've played enough of these to know that i'm trying to thin the field as much as possible. if you're playing at a table that's slightly tighter than normal, you're only getting called or reraised by a good or better hand. if you're a good enough player, you can either bluff the board [unmade], check to the river [depending on a board with a K, Q, or J- no straight draw], or ditch it facing a good bet. i do quit well in these situations, enough to where i raise with this hand.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:37 PM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: Too Tight?


I would fold, and I think doing anything else is pretty terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:37 PM
bkbluedevil bkbluedevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 131
Default Re: Too Tight?

I think 9 handed in early middle position this is an easy fold. Also I don't see how flop play effects it at all when your stack is 13BB.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:43 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]

I would fold, and I think doing anything else is pretty terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you, dawg. when's the last time you played in a buy-in this low? maybe you can't do that at the $55s, $109s, or $215s.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:47 PM
bkbluedevil bkbluedevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 131
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I would fold, and I think doing anything else is pretty terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you, dawg. when's the last time you played in a buy-in this low? maybe you can't do that at the $55s, $109s, or $215s.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you raise here it is a leak in your game. Maybe you can get away with it because the players at the 5+1s have bigger leaks, but I can't see this being a profitable play no matter how bad the players are. Even if all the other players are "any ace whores" I think this is a losing play. Also your argument about "I can play it because I'm good on the flop" doesn't apply. The stacks are too short. If stacks were like 50BB sure. 13BB no. You can only be so good or bad when stack are short.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:48 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]
I think 9 handed in early middle position this is an easy fold. Also I don't see how flop play effects it at all when your stack is 13BB.

[/ QUOTE ]

we're also talking about a table that's slightly tighter than normal and the blinds are at 50/100. my thinking is, if you got a hand, you might as well advertise it by playing it now. i don't like limping and i can't stand limpers. postflop play with a hand like this is where i make alot decent money. most of the tight players i've played in spots like this fold preflop, especially at a table like this.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-09-2005, 05:58 PM
Oluwafemi Oluwafemi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 268
Default Re: Too Tight?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I would fold, and I think doing anything else is pretty terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you, dawg. when's the last time you played in a buy-in this low? maybe you can't do that at the $55s, $109s, or $215s.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you raise here it is a leak in your game. Maybe you can get away with it because the players at the 5+1s have bigger leaks, but I can't see this being a profitable play no matter how bad the players are. Even if all the other players are "any ace whores" I think this is a losing play. Also your argument about "I can play it because I'm good on the flop" doesn't apply. The stacks are too short. If stacks were like 50BB sure. 13BB no. You can only be so good or bad when stack are short.

[/ QUOTE ]

the stacks are'nt too short. and who's to say you're even getting called in this spot? of course i get away with it at the $5 level. of course the players at my level have bigger leaks, that's why i make money. this is'nt the $4K/$8K game mixed game with a $100,000 cap NLHE. i have often raised in spots like this only to get 3 or 4 callers, some of which were dumb enough to even put their chips in spots where they had no business even playing the hand. i finished ITM countless times because others chose to go along for the ride following a raise by me with a hand like this. postflop play does apply. getting out of the way on a flop after you've had this many callers when you still have 10BB+ while others slaughter themselves is is +EV for me. always has been. i don't play with Chip Reeses and Barry Greensteins.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.