#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: small PP utg
solitare thanks for running those calculations really helps put it into perespective
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: small PP utg
you have some scary opponents if they will call with 66. especially those ones who are out of position.
citanul |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: small PP utg
[ QUOTE ]
you have some scary opponents if they will call with 66. especially those ones who are out of position. citanul [/ QUOTE ] my thoughts exactly, what would the icm say if we assume pocket pairs of 99+ calling and the A10s+, AJo+ calling? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: small PP utg
[ QUOTE ]
you have some scary opponents if they will call with 66. especially those ones who are out of position. citanul [/ QUOTE ] You must be stuck in a virtual reality where opponents call allins with like premium hands or something, [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. If you have 88 it's probably a close push/fold...99 is probably a solid push and 77 is most likely a fold. Yugoslav |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: small PP utg
[ QUOTE ]
my thoughts exactly, what would the icm say if we assume pocket pairs of 99+ calling and the A10s+, AJo+ calling? [/ QUOTE ] Ask and ye shall recieve. The SnG Analyzer gives an equity of +0.2% for that calling range. Positive, but not by much. So I guess it comes down to a judgement call -- How tight is the table acting, what is your table image, have you made too many pushes lately, etc. |
|
|