#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
[ QUOTE ]
I don't have 200 posts yet [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but your hundred-something posts are actually good. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
i find this funny from bodog:
Ben Affleck 625/1 David Sklansky 700/1 Shannon Elizabeth 800/1 Yesterday: Ben Affleck 450/1 Shannon Elizabeth 600/1 David Sklansky 700/1 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
my <200 posts are playing too. ps qualifier
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
right. I remembered you after I posted.
your 'backers' or 'investors' don't count for squat. Otherwise we would have SEVERAL dozen people involved just based on Granny. (hell - my parents, and a few others, are backing me....they don't count either). |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
I'll be there. I'd put myself 7000:1 to win.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
The correct odds are in the ballpark of 20-1, but you can't really wager on this because of verifiability.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
[ QUOTE ]
I would be surprised if we only had 20. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, I would have guessed closer to 80 or 100. I'm in, btw. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
I don't have 200 posts, and of the 160 or so posts I do have, a vast majority are in the politics forum. I do lurk alot, though.
I'd put my odds around 8000 to 1. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
i'm in the main event as well. i'm a decent but not great tourney player but with all the luck involved in a tournament you never know.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 at the WSOP ME
Otherwise we would have SEVERAL dozen people involved just based on Granny.
almost a gross |
|
|