Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:31 PM
Voltron87 Voltron87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: checkraising young children
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]
So I can [censored] random women without a condom, including hookers, and I won't get the HIV? SWEET!!!

[/ QUOTE ]


high five, dude. the cops wont hassle us either.

"did you see who stole that car?"
"uh, sort of, I wasn't able to see his face but I could tell he was puerto rican"

problem solved.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:37 PM
shant shant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 809
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

I think you meant strippers, not prostitutes.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:49 PM
Talk2BigSteve Talk2BigSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 123
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Crotch Crickets

[/ QUOTE ]

That phrase is disgusting. Congratulations.

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome to Word Heard From Rednecks 101.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-22-2005, 10:56 PM
BigBaitsim (milo) BigBaitsim (milo) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 373
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

150 times a year. Not a married guy, clearly.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:28 PM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RIP Mitch Hedberg
Posts: 1,097
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]
I think you meant strippers, not prostitutes.

[/ QUOTE ]

HAHAHAH


FWIW, this idea started along the lines of:

Dear Bison,

What are the chances Jason_t is bring some friends home from Vegas?



Then, I remembered that I read about this 'paradox' once, and decided to go this way.


Its interesting, because, for the most part, people mention the safeness of the partner far more than the frequency of the act when discussing the chances of HIV contraction.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:28 PM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RIP Mitch Hedberg
Posts: 1,097
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]
interesting choice of names...

[/ QUOTE ]


Really? How so? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:34 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]

Its interesting, because, for the most part, people mention the safeness of the partner far more than the frequency of the act when discussing the chances of HIV contraction.

[/ QUOTE ]

For a sufficiently safe partner, the frequency of the act will become irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:40 PM
CallMeIshmael CallMeIshmael is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: RIP Mitch Hedberg
Posts: 1,097
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

[ QUOTE ]
For a sufficiently safe partner, the frequency of the act will become irrelevant.

[/ QUOTE ]

Define 'sufficiently safe'
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:42 PM
1800GAMBLER 1800GAMBLER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,828
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

I checked the math, seems right.

0.6% chance of HIV shocks me, a lot. 1/167 americans have HIV?

0.002% chance of getting HIV with an infected partner shocks me too, i thought this would be way higher.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-22-2005, 11:46 PM
mmbt0ne mmbt0ne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 700
Default Re: The HIV Paradox: A Tale of Two Males

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />

Jordan: He is in an 'Either/Or' situation. If Sarah doesnt have HIV, then he will never contract HIV over that year. IF she is, however, the probability of him contracting HIV =

1 - (499/500)^180 = 0.3026

Since, Jordan estimates the probability of Sarah having HIV is 0.3%, his final chance of contracting is:

= 0.0907%

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, fine.

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
Jason: His equation looks like:

1 - P(Getting HIV)

= 1 -

(1 - (1.2/100*1/500))^20*(1-(4/100)*(1/500))^6

= 0.0959%

[/ QUOTE ]

BUZZ!!!!

Sorry, but now you're doing it differently. Now you have the percentage she is HIV+ included with the base of the exponential.

OK, I'M CHANGING THIS.

Correct form for Jason:

Bar Skanks
1-(499/500)^20 = 0.0392
0.0392*0.012 = 0.0004710

Whores
1-(499/500)^6 = 0.0119
0.0119*0.04 = 0.0004776

TOTAL
0.0004710+0.0004776 = 0.0949%


Don't be so mean to Jason, he's not that much more likely at all. Of course, Jordan's situation could be resolved very easily, and he would know automatically how safe it is to bang away.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.