Daniel vs Barry

[Sundevils21]

[ QUOTE ]
Travis it would be nice to see in those reports a few hands where it says "boy Daniel was lucky as hell"!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I just post what I'm sent. If I was down there watching I would try to give an unbiased viewpoint.
The truth though is that DN hasn't gotten lucky very often. One doesn't usually get lucky as hell and lose.
If you read(especially the WSOP threads) Daniel does point out the times he got lucky to stay alive or to win a pot. He also said he got lucky during the match vs. Mimi.
Barry admitted going on a big rush in 7stud to close out the first match. It doesn't really seem like DN is making this bad streak up imo.

-Travis

[Smoothcall]

While i agree Daniel admits when he's lucky against other opponents. Barry is someone that Daniel wants to be bad for reasons even beyond 500k. Daniel will hate losing to Barry more than anyone on the planet. And if he loses more of these matches than he wins it is likely he will say it was bacause of luck rather than saying Barry is better than him. Even if he thought he was outplayed jmo.

[bobaloo23]

I find it funny that DN was crushing him in the Omaha game at the start and said he was hitting a lot of flops. Seems like hes only winning when he has cards, which would clearly show he's getting outplayed. I like his one update too where he says "BG was drawing dead until river". Showing BG sucked out again, and he needed to add the emphasis that he was drawing head. Obviously if he was drawing head he wouldn't have won the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[bobaloo23]

Also funny where he says he had BG all but dead with KK and a straight draw and needed an A,2,5,6 or K. Having 17 outs with presumably 2 cards to come gives him about 60% chance of winning the hand, hardly the huge bad beat DN makes it seem like.

[BTirish]

[ QUOTE ]
Also funny where he says he had BG all but dead with KK and a straight draw and needed an A,2,5,6 or K. Having 17 outs with presumably 2 cards to come gives him about 60% chance of winning the hand, hardly the huge bad beat DN makes it seem like.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check the link again--it has the details on the two hands where BG was all-in.

1.
DN- K K 3 4
BG- Q 10 8 6
Flop: Q 2 5
Turn: 10
River 9

2.
DN- A K 9 4
BG- K J 10 10
Flop: K 9 5
Turn: 5
River:5

It doesn't say when BG was put all-in. You presumed it was on the flop and Daniel was the dog--well, seems to have been the other way around, if the money was put in on the flop. If the money was put in on the turn, pot odds certainly demanded a call by Daniel if it was Barry who moved in. But I think it's most likely that Daniel put Barry all in on the flop.

[Joseph Busti]

Do you know Daniel Negreanu personally??? It seems as though you speak on his behalf alot.

[JustToast]

[ QUOTE ]
Do you know Daniel Negreanu personally??? It seems as though you speak on his behalf alot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Travis is his assistant.

[grass]

http://conjelco.com/wsop98/negreanu.jpeg

[mlagoo]

[ QUOTE ]
http://conjelco.com/wsop98/negreanu.jpeg

[/ QUOTE ]

ouch

[Sundevils21]

The PLO match continues at 3:30 PST w/ DN up 124K.

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...=219983#219983