|
|
#11
06-06-2005, 01:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who doesn\'t call this all-in here?
[ QUOTE ]
The fold is probably good for your table image too. [/ QUOTE ] It's possible that a call will make people less likely to steal from you on the bubble... "that [censored] will call with anything." 
|
|
#12
06-06-2005, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who doesn\'t call this all-in here?
I call with a lot of hands here but not 2-6 little too many chips to blow on a garbage hand.
|
|
#13
06-06-2005, 02:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who doesn\'t call this all-in here?
Easy fold. 2.5:1 is nowhere near good enough to call with 62o.
|
|
#14
06-06-2005, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who doesn\'t call this all-in here?
Yeah, that was just an afterthought. I think a fold will help your FE a little, but I really think the only thing that is important about your table image is knowing what it is - in a SNG anyway.
I'm going to be playing some 25nl soon probably and am intrigued by the recently posted idea of showing a cheap bluff with trash early and then nut-peddling.
|
|
#15
06-06-2005, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who doesn\'t call this all-in here?
[ QUOTE ]
It's not even +$EV unless you put the pusher on just about any two. You don't need a strong hand to call here, but I don't call with trash. The fold is probably good for your table image too. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't think he had an overpair, and I had him making this move with just about any 2 cards, since he was pot committed. I think a fold is even better for my table image in this specific hand. The other SS, Sastrick, is going to be in the bb next hand, and I think he's pot committed and will call 1 raiser with just about any 2 cards. Showing down 62o, win or lose, is probably going to cause the other 3 players before me to tighten up, at least for the next hand.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
