|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: As the dealer, should I have insisted that her hand was dead and only split it two ways regardless o | |||
| No, do what the 2 other players wanted and keep the peace at the table. |
   
|
119 | 85.00% |
| Yes - she mucked , so tough sheet. Split it two ways. |
  
|
21 | 15.00% |
| Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
05-27-2005, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Cy Young
I remember picking up Johan Santana, Jake Peavy, and Mark Prior in my fantasy league a few years back when they were virtually unknown and they all did well for me. I made sure to look after them the following year but they were drafted early or taken somehow when they were basically on reserve the previous year. ESPN did this thing on young phenom Mark Prior and I picked him up that very night and he recorded like 11K's the next day. Sweet feeling.
Anyhow, I pick Santana and Peavy this year. 
|
|
#14
05-27-2005, 03:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cy Young
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] where's brett myers? [/ QUOTE ] Crap, I knew I missed someone [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i vote for him. 4-2, 1.688 ERA, 0.909 WHIP, 74K in 69.1 IP
|
|
#15
05-27-2005, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cy Young
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] where's brett myers? [/ QUOTE ] Crap, I knew I missed someone [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i vote for him. 4-2, 1.688 ERA, 0.909 WHIP, 74K in 69.1 IP [/ QUOTE ] Clemens has better ERA, better WHIP, similar K/9. The W-L is only 1 win off. I don't see how you could have Myers as better. I'm surprised that Pedro hasn't recieved a vote yet.
|
|
#16
05-27-2005, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cy Young
[ QUOTE ]
Clemens has better ERA, better WHIP, similar K/9. The W-L is only 1 win off. I don't see how you could have Myers as better. I'm surprised that Pedro hasn't recieved a vote yet. [/ QUOTE ] well, myers does have a better K/BB and as a red sox fan, i die a little bit every time clemens wins one [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] or maybe it's my contrarian nature voting for the guy left off...
|
|
#17
05-27-2005, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cy Young
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Mike Mussina- 0 0% [/ QUOTE ] I see Dead hasn't seen this yet. [/ QUOTE ] Speaking of Dead, why are Yankees fans so blind in their love for the Yankees? I mean I absolutely love the Minnesota Twins and watch nearly every game on MlbTv, but I'm realistic when it comes to their chances. Yankees fans are like "the Yankees will win the WS this year with 100% probability" [/ QUOTE ] that is just dead being a moron. im not like that. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#18
05-27-2005, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Cy Young
[ QUOTE ]
Speaking of Dead, why are Yankees fans so blind in their love for the Yankees? I mean I absolutely love the Minnesota Twins and watch nearly every game on MlbTv, but I'm realistic when it comes to their chances. Yankees fans are like "the Yankees will win the WS this year with 100% probability" [/ QUOTE ] In no way does Dead represent views of Yankee fans in general. He's just a biased fan. I find fault with a lot of what he says, but don't take time to respond. You're realistic when it comes to Minnesota's chances because for the last decade, Minnesota has not had a chance or has not done any damage in the postseason except for their series win in 2002. The Yankees have not only won four World Series in that span, but have consistently put themselves in a spot to win or reach the World Series. Personally, I think the Yankees' chance to win this year is about 20%. As for the poll, I voted Garland and Willis. That's for current Cy Young. I think the eventual winners will be Santana and Peavy.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
