Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:06 AM
vinyard vinyard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 202
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

How bout you stop kissing his ass, fanboy?

*BUMP*
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:36 AM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

[ QUOTE ]
VPIP: Voluntarily put in pot – percentage of the time a player puts money into the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably should read, "... puts money into the pot when not in the blinds."
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:56 AM
dmmikkel dmmikkel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 169
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

Nice one =) Even a link to my post lol
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-12-2005, 11:11 AM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

I've contacted Mat about stickification. I told him I'd recontact him when there's some concensus that I haven't too horribly botched anything.

the VPIP change has been made for next release to: percentage of the time a player puts money into the pot that is not forced by the blinds.

I apparently have missed some good discussions about moving/handling 4-8 tabling, so I will try to find those, hopefully with some assistance, and include them in the "should I move up/play more tables, etc" section.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-12-2005, 11:26 AM
Degen Degen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Re-stealing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

it'd be good to have a part that talks about the diff between the levels, or at least between diff between 800/1000 chips

and maybe something about the steps...



Andre
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-12-2005, 11:59 AM
vindikation vindikation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 181
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

NICE, thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-12-2005, 12:20 PM
Phil Van Sexton Phil Van Sexton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

Well done.

My only comment would be move the Common Terms to the end. All the other Q+As are nice and short, but this one requires a lot of scrolling.

Or link to another post with Terms. Anything to make this page easier to read. I don't want people to lose interest before getting to the good stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-12-2005, 12:22 PM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

[ QUOTE ]
it'd be good to have a part that talks about the diff between the levels, or at least between diff between 800/1000 chips

and maybe something about the steps...



Andre

[/ QUOTE ]

i honestly don't think that there's anything interesting enough about the step tournaments to warrant being considered a frequently asked question.

the differences between the levels i think that i pretty concisely stuffed in there as "when you move up, the players get better on average." my goal was not to make a strategy guide, and so i didn't make this post about the strategy differences to make when moving up levels, or when getting more chips. if you're aware of a post that you think is particularly insightful on this topic, feel free to pm it to me.

citanul
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-12-2005, 12:23 PM
TStokes TStokes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 55
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

nice work thanks
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-12-2005, 12:28 PM
citanul citanul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 64
Default Re: SNG FAQ v.001

[ QUOTE ]
Well done.

My only comment would be move the Common Terms to the end. All the other Q+As are nice and short, but this one requires a lot of scrolling.

Or link to another post with Terms. Anything to make this page easier to read. I don't want people to lose interest before getting to the good stuff.

[/ QUOTE ]

thanks phil, this issue was brought to my attention already, and the common terms have been moved to the end.

i'm thinking about making like a list of the questions and putting them at the top, but i don't think the total document is long enough to warrant that. it would be nice if there was internal anchor tags in the ubb code, but there isn't. also considered posting the FAQ offsite, but decided not to. i thought up a silly way to handle this if i had a thread that only i could post in, but it would be really convoluted and dumb.

citanul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.