#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
70 tables, 215's. 60% ROI. holla
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
[ QUOTE ]
degen posts 27.5% in the 55s, I'm at around 20% in the 33s. [/ QUOTE ] I wish. 27.5% at the 33's (down to 25%, just had a horrid streak i'm finally pulling out of)...17% at the 55's, though i don't 8-table the 55's. Andre |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
see Irie's signing off post for this.
he put his estimation from having coached/played/backed over 10k SNG's. Andre |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
[ QUOTE ]
Someone with a -15% ROI could make money over 400 SNGs (two standard deviations), so I don't think this samplesize is very representative [/ QUOTE ] Right. But could they attain a 27.5% ROI (thats what it is now after 350)? Besides, I have proved myself at every level, so its not like I have a good ROI aftetr just 350 tourneys- I have had a 20% ROI after about 3k tourneys now total (including from the $5s to the $55s). All I'm saying is that, as shown by other posters as well, a 20%+ ROI is certainly atainable 8-tabling. I understand that this is probably not close to my true ROI, but it does show that a decent ROI is attainable 8-tabling. Jess |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
I do about 10% at the 55s 8 tabling
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
first, his estimates are way off and its not for 8-tabling
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
im not calling you a losing player =) just saying that 300 sngs isnt much. But it seems like several people think 20% is possible even at 33s, so I'm very happy.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
i'm sure a lot of that is 8-tabled...and its not the gospel, its just one mans opinion based up a lot of data/experience....thought it might be helpful.
Andre |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 8-tabling 11s-55s
yeah sry
but the problem is that it is in fact estimates |
|
|