|
|
#11
05-01-2005, 09:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarkmeister?
My read is throwing everyone off. I should have said I didn't think he was capable of bluff raising the river. I think only a select few of 5/10 players are capable of that move.
Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has 2s 4s (flush, queen high). MP has 9d 9c (two pair, nines and threes). Outcome: Hero wins 7 BB. </font> Krishan 
|
|
#12
05-01-2005, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
[ QUOTE ]
My read is throwing everyone off. I should have said I didn't think he was capable of bluff raising the river. I think only a select few of 5/10 players are capable of that move. Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has 2s 4s (flush, queen high). MP has 9d 9c (two pair, nines and threes). Outcome: Hero wins 7 BB. </font> Krishan [/ QUOTE ] unless Im on crack, those results dont match the hand you posted
|
|
#13
05-01-2005, 09:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
unless Im on crack, those results dont match the hand you posted [/ QUOTE ] i smoked from that pipe to i guess [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
05-01-2005, 09:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
you may be on crack, but they def don't match. :-P
Surf
|
|
#15
05-01-2005, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
btw, who is Clarkmeister or Clarkmeisters theorem?
im sorry for the question but im from sweden, stupid and constantly smoking crack with Alobar.
|
|
#18
05-01-2005, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
The rational between the bet fold line is that they are going to value bet any club if you check anyways, while checking behind many hands they would have called a bet with. Also, most players won't raise less than say a jack flush at lowest, and many only A or K flushes, so you can safely fold to a raise. Basically you are nullifying their positional advantage as much as you can.
-Mike
|
|
#19
05-01-2005, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
Is it really safe to assume he's not going to raise with less than a J club, and safe to assume that many players are calling here with less than a decent club. If so, I understand the logic of the bet out line, but I'm not sure about those assumptions.
|
|
#20
05-01-2005, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Clarkmeister?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My read is throwing everyone off. I should have said I didn't think he was capable of bluff raising the river. I think only a select few of 5/10 players are capable of that move. Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has 2s 4s (flush, queen high). MP has 9d 9c (two pair, nines and threes). Outcome: Hero wins 7 BB. </font> Krishan [/ QUOTE ] unless Im on crack, those results dont match the hand you posted [/ QUOTE ] Well [censored]. I didn't promise real results. Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> Hero has 6h 6c (flush, queen high). Button has 2d Ah (one pair, fours). Outcome: Hero wins 6.20 BB. </font> The thing about this hand is I am right. And Alobar is right. Basically you don't beat a damn thing on this river. Everything points to you being beat. Everytime you check-call you are going to lose. Once in a while he'll have a hand that you beat and will check behind. So the real choice here is between betting and folding to a raise or checkfolding. Check-calling is infinitely worse than bet-folding. Krishan
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
