Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-20-2005, 08:51 PM
Nick C Nick C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,582
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe everyone is cool with the preflop call. I fold here preflop almost automatically. Therein lies your problem.

[/ QUOTE ]

SB could be raising what he sees as a couple of weak LP limpers, but I do agree that KQo is not a fun hand to play against a legitimate preflop raise, even at a discount.

A read on SB would be helpful here.

Anyway, I don't know what's best preflop, but I did consider folding as an option. I just didn't feel strongly enough about it to mention it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-20-2005, 09:30 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe everyone is cool with the preflop call. I fold here preflop almost automatically. Therein lies your problem.

[/ QUOTE ]

Call is easy IMO unless the SB is a known rock. At least two of the opponents will have shitty hands here.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-20-2005, 09:40 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]


Call is easy IMO unless the SB is a known rock. At least two of the opponents will have shitty hands here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this because you're getting a discount? If so, aren't you still as likely to be dominated by a reasonable range of SB raising hands? (TT-AA, AK, AQ) And if it's the opponents' hands that concern you, are you cold-calling KQo on the button after a light LP raise follows a few donk limpers?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-20-2005, 09:44 PM
nolanfan34 nolanfan34 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oly, WA
Posts: 70
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Call is easy IMO unless the SB is a known rock. At least two of the opponents will have shitty hands here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this because you're getting a discount? If so, aren't you still as likely to be dominated by a reasonable range of SB raising hands? (TT-AA, AK, AQ) And if it's the opponents' hands that concern you, are you cold-calling KQo on the button after a light LP raise follows a few donk limpers?

[/ QUOTE ]

How are you "dominated" by TT and JJ?

I'd call there everytime too. I think the raising range there of the SB is much wider than you're stating. Being out of position will suck, but for one more bet? I'm in.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-20-2005, 09:45 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

I don't get why the SB's raising range needs to be so tight, especially against two late position limpers, and with a tight player in the big blind. I'd be raising stuff like QTs and 66 there.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-20-2005, 09:53 PM
gaming_mouse gaming_mouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: my hero is sfer
Posts: 2,480
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why the SB's raising range needs to be so tight, especially against two late position limpers, and with a tight player in the big blind. I'd be raising stuff like QTs and 66 there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nate,

I agree. Also, I understand the reasoning behind raising QTs here (to build a pot that will tie people to there hands if you hit it, and also as a way to set up bluffs), but I don't see the reasoning behind raising 66 here. Could you explain?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-20-2005, 10:00 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why the SB's raising range needs to be so tight, especially against two late position limpers, and with a tight player in the big blind. I'd be raising stuff like QTs and 66 there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nate,

I agree. Also, I understand the reasoning behind raising QTs here (to build a pot that will tie people to there hands if you hit it, and also as a way to set up bluffs), but I don't see the reasoning behind raising 66 here. Could you explain?

[/ QUOTE ]

The 66 raise is mostly just to set up a steal on the flop. It also makes it more likely that my hand will hold up unimproved if I can get the BB out.

My guess is that I'd raise the QTs maybe 2/3 of the time here and the 66 maybe 1/2 of the time, depends a lot on my image.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-20-2005, 10:08 PM
gaming_mouse gaming_mouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: my hero is sfer
Posts: 2,480
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]


The 66 raise is mostly just to set up a steal on the flop. It also makes it more likely that my hand will hold up unimproved if I can get the BB out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting....

So I'd guess in loose, calling-station type game you wouldn't make this move with 66.

Also, let's say you have 66 and the flop come AJ6r. Do you bet out or c/r? How about if the A was a K?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-20-2005, 10:39 PM
Nate tha' Great Nate tha' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]
So I'd guess in loose, calling-station type game you wouldn't make this move with 66.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, let's say you have 66 and the flop come AJ6r. Do you bet out or c/r? How about if the A was a K?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hells yeah I bet out.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-21-2005, 01:44 AM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: KQo on BB problems..

[ QUOTE ]


How are you "dominated" by TT and JJ?



[/ QUOTE ]

You aren't. I just said considering his range of hands, which includes TT and JJ but also AK and AQ and QQ-AA, most of them have you dominated. Maybe it's true that he raises lighter than that, but I usually don't see SB raises that are so light. Maybe if he's a thinking player, but most people aren't thinking players.

So I'm the only person who folds here?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.