Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

[PotatoStew]

I find it very amusing that your entire post is contained in the very first reply.

I also think you had a perfectly valid point.

[Emmitt2222]

I don't really like to agree with you in any way but I must on this point. It would benefit Mr. Sklansky a lot more to do some reading instead of asking people in a poker forum and philosophy and theology do not really belong in psychology. I hate to say it but this was a pretty unjust deleting of a thread, although it could have been phrased a bit less caustiscally. There goes freedom of speech.

[please don't ban me, I still like your books and buy them in mass quantity]

[PotatoStew]

You don't like to agree with *me*, or the original poster? Just checking, because you replied to my post, and I'd hate to think you found me that disagreeable.

[Toro]

This is pretty funny. The post was deleted but if you want to see it, all you have to do is go to the first reply which quotes the original post.

Nice try Mat. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[twang]

[ QUOTE ]
This is pretty funny. The post was deleted but if you want to see it, all you have to do is go to the first reply which quotes the original post.

[/ QUOTE ]
This thread is, in its own unique way, pretty bizarre: A (former?) troll extraordinaire posts a piece of well articulated criticism aimed at the owner of these boards. The owner of these boards, one of the worlds foremost poker authors and also a strenuous advocate of the IQ concept, gets the original post deleted, but (accidentally?) leaves the entire content of the post in a quote found in the first reply of the thread. And just to make things even more strange: None of the replies flames the original poster.

/twang