|
|
#12
03-11-2005, 07:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
I prefer to see the bb/100, then gives some idea of whether you actually need any advice.
I think your stats look great, good vpip, good pfr, and good att to steal the blinds so seems you play position. Folded to bb steal looks ok, depends really on how well you are playing and what you are losing in this position, if your losing more than .15bb/100 then tighten up a bit. Also do what feels right, experimient with open limping with a few hands, if you feel open raising isnt right for you. Dont have to take everyones advice that is from this forum, 
|
|
#13
03-11-2005, 08:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
P.S. Notice how I x'ed out bb/hand and bb/100 since they're irrelevant right now? [/ QUOTE ] Well, you got rid of them in one place at least. I can still see them on the screenshot though Sample is really far too small to say anything: you could be getting great hands in the BB for instance. Guy.
|
|
#14
03-11-2005, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
I prefer to see the bb/100, then gives some idea of whether you actually need any advice. [/ QUOTE ] No, why? After 4445 hands, there is very little information in that number, so to give advice based on his BB/100 at this point is not a good idea.
|
|
#15
03-11-2005, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
Your screenshot is too small. The only thing I can see is your screen name on the top that you failed to delete. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
And FWIW, the fishiest names possible are clearly good players. You are trying to hard to make a fishy name.
|
|
#16
03-11-2005, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
If its over 3bb/100 hen he dont need advice from forum monkeys playing under 3.
|
|
#17
03-11-2005, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
Overall, I think those stats look pretty good.
The only one that maybe looked a little out of place is "Folded BB to Steal: 46.24". I'm not at home, so I can't check my PT database to confirm right now, but I think you may be defending too much out of the BB. VP$IP and PFR% will converge fairly quickly, but most other things like win rate take MANY more hands. Also, I will second that you generally should not be open limping much, if at all. Open limping on the button just seems very wrong to me unless you are getting sneaky with a big hand, still though nobody believes you anyway, so just raise. But yeah if it is loose passive, and you come in early with QTs okay; JT and J9 are still a muck for me anywhere but the on the button, maaaybe the CO.
|
|
#19
03-11-2005, 11:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
If its over 3bb/100 hen he dont need advice from forum monkeys playing under 3. [/ QUOTE ] Exce1, It happens that it's 5.12/bb/100 so far, which is damn near irre1evant. I don't have anything persona against you, but p1ease use your hatred of some members of the forum to do1e out wrongfu1 advice. Cheers, Dan
|
|
#20
03-12-2005, 03:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stats for first 4k+ hands at Party 5/10
If that figure is "damn near irrelevant" then so are all other stats, except the vpip and pfr, which makes you a complete moron for asking people to comment on all the others except the bb/100 with so few hands. So taking advice from forum members which muck lower bb/100 makes you
a complete moron.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
