|
|
#11
03-01-2005, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88, interesting flop
I thought you were calling the flop to raise the turn. I think this is too passive. If UTG has a 4 you may have pacified yourself out of the pot.
-DeathDonkey 
|
|
#12
03-01-2005, 07:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 88, interesting flop
[ QUOTE ]
I thought you were calling the flop to raise the turn. I think this is too passive. If UTG has a 4 you may have pacified yourself out of the pot. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] UTG is the maniac. I still think raising the flop is much better than raising the turn here. Rob
|
|
#13
03-01-2005, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 88, interesting flop
I agree but there needs to be a raise somewhere and I just thought that was hero's plan in the first place.
-DeathDonkey
|
|
#14
03-01-2005, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 88, interesting flop
That was my plan, but I picked up a gut-shot and I didn't want to open the action up to UTG again (or the BB, for that matter).
Ent, why do you think raising the flop is better than waiting?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
