#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ranking system for home games
I have the same problem. To gauge the "stakes" of a game, I usually find the difference between the most won, and the most lost. Usually, it's around $100. However, some of our games have been smaller stakes, ($20 spread), and some have been higher ($200 or more). So I use the actual dollar figures, but they're only about 20% of the value for someone's statistics. I also factor how well they did in the game (rank) 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th....., and how well they did relative to the person who lost the most money. These stats account for the remaining 80% of someone's ranking.
Rob |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ranking system for home games
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ranking system for home games
I take it you're not running tournaments but instead, limit games.
I'd suggest big bets/hour. Takes the table stakes out of it. -Ryan |
|
|